China's carbon dioxide emission and driving factors: A spatial analysis

被引:44
|
作者
Yang, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yannan [1 ,2 ]
Poon, Jessie [3 ]
He, Ze [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Geog, Buffalo, NY 14261 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon dioxide intensity; Spatial dependence; Spatial autoregressive models; Direct effect; Indirect effect; PEARL RIVER DELTA; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; URBANIZATION PROCESS; PANEL; IMPACT; LEVEL; INTENSITY; POPULATION; INDUSTRIALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.185
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A burgeoning literature is emerging on China's high levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission. Yet policies remain elusive in part because of conflictual empirical findings and insufficient attention to China's complex spatial terrain. This paper conducts a spatial analysis of China's CO2 intensity (CEI) based on six major drivers, and shows that region-targetted strategies may be more effective in tackling CEI. Specifically, results from spatial autoregressive models indicate that drivers vary significantly across regions: changing the energy production mix through alternative sources of energy is likely to have a stronger effect on the Northwest and Middle Yangtze River but it is less effective for the South and East Coasts. Changes in population, urbanization, industrial structure and technology are more likely to lead to CEI reduction for South and East Coasts. Moreover at the regional level, spatial effects are more indirect and widespread spilling over to neighboring regions for the Middle Yellow River and Northeast. But they are more direct and contained affecting residents within the region for the Middle Yangtze River, South, North and East Coasts. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 651
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatial characteristics of carbon dioxide emission intensity of urban road traffic and driving factors: Road network and land use
    Yang, Yang
    Takase, Tatsuo
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2024, 113
  • [32] A non-parametric analysis of the driving factors of China's carbon prices
    Lin, Boqiang
    Xu, Bin
    [J]. Energy Economics, 2021, 104
  • [33] A non-parametric analysis of the driving factors of China's carbon prices
    Lin, Boqiang
    Xu, Bin
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 104
  • [34] Spatial imbalance and factors influencing carbon emission efficiency in China's transport industry
    Ma, Qifei
    Jia, Peng
    Kuang, Haibo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [35] Regional differences and driving factors analysis of carbon emission intensity from transport sector in China
    Liu, Jiaguo
    Li, Sujuan
    Ji, Qiang
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 224
  • [36] Reinvestigating the Spatiotemporal Differences and Driving Factors of Urban Carbon Emission in China
    Wang, Ke-Liang
    Xu, Ru-Yu
    Zhang, Fu-Qin
    Cheng, Yun-He
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [37] Research on the Dynamic Evolution and Driving Factors of the Carbon Emission Capacity in China
    Hu Chu-zhi
    Huang Xian-jin
    Zhong Taiyang
    Wang Qianqian
    Zhao Chengsheng
    [J]. 2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-11, 2009, : 3985 - 3990
  • [38] SPATIAL ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF LIVING-ENERGY CARBON EMISSIONS IN CHINA AND ITS DRIVING FACTORS
    Tao, Dong
    Li, Shuang
    Tang, Yanyan
    Xia, Qing
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2018, 27 (07): : 4952 - 4964
  • [39] Spatial-temporal heterogeneity and driving factors of carbon emissions in China
    Ding, Tao
    Huang, Yufei
    He, Weijun
    Zhuang, Delin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (27) : 35830 - 35843
  • [40] Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: A modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis
    Wang, Qunwei
    Chiu, Yung-Ho
    Chiu, Ching-Ren
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 : 252 - 260