Cognitive flexibility and decision-making in a model of conditional visuomotor associations

被引:15
|
作者
Loh, M
Deco, G
机构
[1] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] ICREA, Barcelona 08010, Spain
关键词
attractor network; error trials; integrate-and-fire network; multistable attractors; prefrontal cortex;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04505.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Arbitrary visuomotor associations map a stimulus onto a particular response upon reinforcing rewards. Changes in the associations between stimuli and responses require the neural networks to discard the already learned mappings and build new ones. This is a key aspect of cognitive flexibility. In addition, learning within this experimental paradigm requires a trial-and-error exploration strategy of the available stimulus-response associations. A system performing this task must be able to both build up mappings for stimulus-response associations and at the same time perform non-deterministically to explore the behavioural space until it reaches certainty. We hypothesize an integrate-and-fire network model that accounts for the neurophysiological data of a conditional visuomotor association task and is able to show non-deterministic behaviour. We aim at identifying multistable attractor regimes in the network dynamics, which intrinsically enable the system to make errors and thereby to perform trial-and-error exploration. Our model combines cognitive flexibility with multistable attractors in neurodynamical systems, believed to be the basis of decision-making. If multistable attractors support the exploration of the behavioural space, then our model predicts that the brain should respond stochastically with correct or incorrect activity to visuomotor associations until it has reached certainty. This should be visible not only in the corresponding activity in the premotor area, but also in activity corresponding to other associations or even other stimuli in the prefrontal cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:2927 / 2936
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk, reward, and decision-making in a rodent model of cognitive aging
    Gilbert, Ryan J.
    Mitchell, Marci R.
    Simon, Nicholas W.
    Banuelos, Cristina
    Setlow, Barry
    Bizon, Jennifer L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [32] COGNITIVE PROCESS MODEL OF FOREIGN-POLICY DECISION-MAKING
    BONHAM, GM
    SHAPIRO, MJ
    NOZICKA, GJ
    [J]. SIMULATION & GAMING, 1976, 7 (02) : 123 - 152
  • [33] Cognitive model of animal behavior to comprehend an aspect of decision-making
    Migita, M
    Moriyama, T
    [J]. COMPUTING ANTICIPATORY SYSTEMS, 2004, 718 : 451 - 458
  • [34] A NEW MILITARY DECISION-MAKING MODEL FROM COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE
    Liu, Jing
    Luo, Ai-Min
    Luo, Xue-Shan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 881 - 884
  • [35] Dissociation of emotional decision-making from cognitive decision-making in chronic schizophrenia
    Lee, Yanghyun
    Kim, Yang-Tae
    Seo, Eugene
    Park, Oaktae
    Jeong, Sung-Hun
    Kim, Sang Heon
    Lee, Seung-Jae
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2007, 152 (2-3) : 113 - 120
  • [36] The impact of cognitive expenditure on the ethical decision-making process: The cognitive elaboration model
    Street, MD
    Douglas, SC
    Geiger, SW
    Martinko, MJ
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2001, 86 (02) : 256 - 277
  • [37] THE COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING
    SCHWENK, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1988, 25 (01) : 41 - 55
  • [38] Cognitive Biases in Cyber Decision-Making
    Lemay, Antoine
    Leblanc, Sylvain
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY (ICCWS 2018), 2018, : 395 - 401
  • [39] Cognitive Decision-making and Public Opinions
    Mo, Wang
    [J]. NEUROQUANTOLOGY, 2018, 16 (05) : 553 - 560
  • [40] Cognitive impairment and decision-making capacity
    Sarazin, F
    Walker, L
    Mendella, P
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 20 (07) : 926 - 926