Effects of Incentives and Prenotification on Response Rates and Costs in a National Web Survey of Physicians

被引:51
|
作者
Dykema, Jennifer [1 ]
Stevenson, John [1 ]
Day, Brendan [1 ]
Sellers, Sherrill L. [2 ]
Bonham, Vence L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Univ Wisconsin Survey Center, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[3] NHGRI, Social & Behav Res Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
physicians; response rates; web surveys; incentives; costs; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MAIL SURVEYS; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1177/0163278711406113
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Little is known about what strategies are cost-effective in increasing participation among physicians in surveys that are conducted exclusively via the web. To assess the effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs, general internists (N = 3,550) were randomly selected from the American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile and assigned to experimental groups that varied in the amount of a promised incentive (none, entry into a $200 lottery, $50, or $100) and prenotification (none, prenotification letter only, or prenotification letter containing a $2 preincentive). Results indicated that the response rates were highest in the groups promised $100 and $50, respectively. While the postal prenotification letter increased response rates, the inclusion of a small token $2 preincentive had no effect on participation. Further, unlike mail surveys of physicians, the $2 preincentive was not cost-effective. Among physicians, larger promised incentives of $50 or $100 are more effective than a nominal preincentive in increasing participation in a web-only survey. Consistent with prior research, there was little evidence of nonresponse bias among the experimental groups.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE IMPACT OF INCENTIVES AND 3 FORMS OF POSTAGE ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES
    GITELSON, R
    KERSTETTER, D
    GUADAGNOLO, F
    [J]. LEISURE SCIENCES, 1993, 15 (04) : 321 - 327
  • [32] Respondent Incentives in a National Face-to-Face Survey Effects on Outcome Rates, Sample Composition and Fieldwork Efforts
    Blohm, Michael
    Koch, Achim
    [J]. METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2013, 7 (01): : 89 - 122
  • [33] Effect of Monetary Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates for Midwestern Farmers
    Glas, Zoe E.
    Getson, Jackie M.
    Gao, Yuling
    Singh, Ajay S.
    Eanes, Francis R.
    Esman, Laura A.
    Bulla, Brian R.
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 32 (02) : 229 - 237
  • [34] Irritable bowel syndrome: are incentives useful for improving survey response rates?
    Patten, SB
    Li, FX
    Cook, T
    Hilsden, RJ
    Sutherland, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03) : 256 - 261
  • [35] The Effect of Invitation Design on Web Survey Response Rates
    Kaplowitz, Michael D.
    Lupi, Frank
    Couper, Mick P.
    Thorp, Laurie
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2012, 30 (03) : 339 - 349
  • [36] The impact of contact type on web survey response rates
    Porter, SR
    Whitcomb, ME
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2003, 67 (04) : 579 - 588
  • [37] Factors Affecting Response Rates of the Web Survey with Teachers
    Lavidas, Konstantinos
    Petropoulou, Antonia
    Papadakis, Stamatios
    Apostolou, Zoi
    Komis, Vassilis
    Jimoyiannis, Athanassios
    Gialamas, Vasilis
    [J]. COMPUTERS, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [38] An investigation of the effect of lotteries on Web survey response rates
    Heerwegh, Dirk
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2006, 18 (02) : 205 - 220
  • [39] Effects of Personalization and Invitation Email Length on Web-Based Survey Response Rates
    Trespalacios J.H.
    Perkins R.A.
    [J]. TechTrends, 2016, 60 (4) : 330 - 335
  • [40] SURVEY SPONSORSHIP, RESPONSE RATES, AND RESPONSE EFFECTS
    PRESSER, S
    BLAIR, J
    TRIPLETT, T
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 73 (03) : 699 - 702