Exploring Farm Anaerobic Digester Economic Viability in a Time of Policy Change in the UK

被引:7
|
作者
Bywater, Angela [1 ]
Kusch-Brandt, Sigrid [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] Univ Appl Sci Ulm, Fac Math Nat Sci & Management, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
agricultural wastes; biogas production; anaerobic digestion costs; economic viability; UK policy; Brexit; feed-in tariff; renewable heat incentive; METHANE PRODUCTION; CO-DIGESTION; PRODUCTION RESPONSES; LACTATING HOLSTEIN; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DRINKING-WATER; CATTLE SLURRY; FOOD WASTE; BIOGAS; MANURE;
D O I
10.3390/pr10020212
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The combination of a post-Brexit agricultural policy, the Global Methane Pledge announced during the last United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow (COP26), and urgency of meeting climate goals means the UK has a unique opportunity to create an exemplar through recognition of the benefits of small-scale farm anaerobic digesters that valorise on-site wastes for renewable electricity and heat, cushioning agri-businesses against energy perturbations. To explore economic viability of farm-based biogas production, combinations of support levels, energy prices, capital cost, internal rate of return (IRR), and digestate value were analysed, employing a 550-cow dairy farm with access to other agricultural wastes. A 145 kWe system utilising 100% of CHP electricity (grid value: 0.1361 pound per kWh) and 70% of the heat (heating oil value: 0.055 pound per kWh) could achieve an IRR above 15.5% with a median electricity tariff of 0.1104 pound per kWh at a heat tariff from 0.0309 pound to 0.0873 pound per kWh thermal. Under a subsidy-free regime, the same system could achieve a 10% IRR with electricity prices in the range 0.149 pound to 0.261 pound per kWh. High fertiliser prices could increase digestate value, further improving viability. With late-2021 high energy prices, the technology approaches subsidy-free viability, but uptake is unlikely unless wider environmental and societal benefits of on-farm systems can be explicitly valued.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] AN ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF A MAINE DAIRY FARM ANAEROBIC DIGESTER
    CRINER, GK
    SILVER, DF
    KING, FR
    LEIBY, JD
    KEZIS, AS
    [J]. MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN, 1986, (816): : 1 - 28
  • [2] Topical aural antibiotic use in the UK - time for a change of policy?
    Youngs, Robin
    Fisher, Edward
    Hussain, Musheer
    Fishman, Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2016, 130 (01): : 1 - 1
  • [3] Exploring the role of materials in policy change: innovation in low-energy housing in the UK
    Lovell, Heather
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2007, 39 (10): : 2500 - 2517
  • [4] Neoliberalism by stealth? Exploring continuity and change within the UK social enterprise policy paradigm
    Nicholls, Alex
    Teasdale, Simon
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 2017, 45 (03): : 323 - 341
  • [5] Exploring medicinal use of cannabis in a time of policy change in New Zealand
    Rychert, Marta
    Wilkins, Chris
    Parker, Karl
    Graydon-Guy, Thomas
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 133 (1515) : 54 - 69
  • [6] Potential for Energy Production from Farm Wastes Using Anaerobic Digestion in the UK: An Economic Comparison of Different Size Plants
    Oreggioni, Gabriel D.
    Gowreesunker, Baboo Lesh
    Tassou, Savvas A.
    Bianchi, Giuseppe
    Reilly, Matthew
    Kirby, Marie E.
    Toop, Trisha A.
    Theodorou, Mike K.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (09)
  • [7] A spreadsheet calculator for estimating biogas production and economic measures for UK-based farm-fed anaerobic digesters
    Wu, Anthony
    Lovett, David
    McEwan, Matthew
    Cecelja, Franjo
    Chen, Tao
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 220 : 479 - 489
  • [8] Economic and environmental performance of microalgal energy products - A case study exploring circular bioeconomy principles applied to recycled anaerobic digester waste flows
    Ro, Jin Wook
    Yothers, Cody
    Kendall, Alissa
    Franz, Annaliese
    Zhang, Ruihong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 358
  • [9] New-entrant screening for tuberculosis at port of entry in the UK: Is it time to change policy?
    Punamiya, Vikas
    Kunst, Heinke
    Dedicoat, Martin
    Troko, Joy
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 40
  • [10] Policy change at a time of retrenchment: Recent pension reform in France, Germany, Italy and the UK
    Taylor-Gooby, P
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 1999, 33 (01) : 1 - 19