Available methods for the sampling of nectar, pollen, and flowers of different plant species

被引:0
|
作者
Knaebe, Silvio [1 ]
Mack, Pierre [1 ]
Chen, Ang [2 ]
Bocksch, Sigrun [1 ]
机构
[1] Eurofins Agrosci EcoChem GmbH, Eutinger Str 24, D-75223 Niefern Oschelbronn, Germany
[2] Hunan Plant Protect Inst, Changsha 410125, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The new draft EFSA guidance document introduces additional assessment factors for pollinators other than honey bees. However, there are no standard test protocols available. Therefore, the only way for risk assessment refinements, are a more precise estimate of the potential exposure in nectar and pollen. The aim of the paper is to present available sampling methods of nectar and pollen but also tries to refine methodology for sampling of nectar and pollen mentioned in the guidance document. Results: Nectar can be collected by hand from a wide variety of crop plants. This can be done with the help of capillaries as well as with centrifugation. Pollen can be collected with manual sampling or the help of a suction pump. Bees and bumble bees can be used for both matrices with many plants. Solitary bees are able to collect pollen. More detailed results are presented for oil seed rape and Phacelia. Conclusion: Nectar and pollen can be collected from flowering crop plants visited by pollinators in amounts that are high enough to allow residue analysis. However, the minimum number of bees needed to collect the amount is not 20 but much higher, depending on the species of plant sampled. At least 200 honey bees should be collected for each matrix.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 138
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: Implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system
    Burkle, Laura A.
    Irwin, Rebecca E.
    Newman, Daniel A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 94 (12) : 1935 - 1943
  • [32] Foraging for nectar and pollen on thistle flowers (Cirsium vulgare) and artificial flowers: How bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) respond to colony requirements
    Plowright, CMS
    Cohen-Salmon, D
    Landry, F
    Simonds, V
    BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 136 : 951 - 963
  • [33] Consequences of nectar robbing for the fitness of a threatened plant species
    Sílvia Castro
    Paulo Silveira
    Luis Navarro
    Plant Ecology, 2008, 199 : 201 - 208
  • [34] Consequences of nectar robbing for the fitness of a threatened plant species
    Castro, Silvia
    Silveira, Paulo
    Navarro, Luis
    PLANT ECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (02) : 201 - 208
  • [35] Pollen and nectar have different effects on the development and reproduction of noctuid moths
    He, Limei
    Zhao, Shengyuan
    He, Wei
    Wu, Kongming
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 10
  • [36] NECTAR AND POLLEN AS RESOURCES, AS SEEN IN THE ECOLOGICAL ROLE OF VISITORS TO THE FLOWERS OF PSEUDOBOMBAX-ELLIPTICUM (HBK) DUGAND
    EGUIARTE, L
    DELRIO, CM
    ARITA, H
    BIOTROPICA, 1987, 19 (01) : 74 - 82
  • [37] Variation in Nectar and Pollen Availability, Sucrose Preference, and Daily Response in the Use of Flowers by Heliconius erato phyllis
    Barp, Elisete A.
    Soares, Geraldo L. G.
    Giani, Erica J. M.
    Rodrigues, Daniela
    Moreira, Gilson R. P.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 2011, 24 (03) : 200 - 219
  • [38] Clothianidin residues in pollen and nectar of cucurbits following different use patterns
    Bondarenko, Svetlana
    Rose, Allan
    Ansolabehere, Mike
    Allen, Richard
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [39] An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Vicia faba) flowers: Nectar, pollen, and operative force
    Bailes, Emily J.
    Pattrick, Jonathan G.
    Glover, Beverley J.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (06): : 3161 - 3171
  • [40] Variation in Nectar and Pollen Availability, Sucrose Preference, and Daily Response in the Use of Flowers by Heliconius erato phyllis
    Elisete A. Barp
    Geraldo L. G. Soares
    Erica J. M. Giani
    Daniela Rodrigues
    Gilson R. P. Moreira
    Journal of Insect Behavior, 2011, 24 : 200 - 219