SDSS galaxy bias from halo mass-bias relation and its cosmological implications

被引:132
|
作者
Seljak, U [1 ]
Makarov, A
Mandelbaum, R
Hirata, CM
Padmanabhan, N
McDonald, P
Blanton, MR
Tegmark, M
Bahcall, NA
Brinkmann, J
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Phys, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Phys, Ctr Cosmol & Particle Phys, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Phys, St Petersburg 191011, Russia
[4] MIT, Dept Phys, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[5] Princeton Univ Observ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[6] Apache Point Observ, Sunspot, NM 88349 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2005年 / 71卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.71.043511
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We combine the measurements of luminosity dependence of bias with the luminosity dependent weak lensing analysis of dark matter around galaxies to derive the galaxy bias and constrain amplitude of mass fluctuations. We take advantage of theoretical and simulation predictions that predict that, while halo bias is rapidly increasing with mass for high masses, it is nearly constant in low mass halos. We use a new weak lensing analysis around the same Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) galaxies to determine their halo mass probability distribution. We use these halo mass probability distributions to predict the bias for each luminosity subsample. Galaxies below L-* are antibiased with b<1 and for these galaxies bias is only weakly dependent on luminosity. In contrast, for galaxies above L-* bias is rapidly increasing with luminosity. These observations are in an excellent agreement with theoretical predictions based on weak lensing halo mass determination combined with halo bias-mass relations. We find that for standard cosmological parameters theoretical predictions are able to explain the observed luminosity dependence of bias over six magnitudes in absolute luminosity. We combine the bias constraints with those from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and the SDSS power spectrum analysis to derive new constraints on bias and sigma(8). For the most general parameter space that includes running and neutrino mass, we find sigma(8)=0.88+/-0.06 and b(*)=0.99+/-0.07. In the context of spatially flat models we improve the limit on the neutrino mass for the case of three degenerate families from m(nu)<0.6 eV without bias to m(nu)<0.18 eV with bias (95% C.L.), which is weakened to m(nu)<0.24 eV if running is allowed. The corresponding limit for 3 massless+1 massive neutrino is 1.37 eV.
引用
收藏
页码:043511 / 1
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cosmological constraints from the full-shape galaxy power spectrum in SDSS-III BOSS using the BACCO hybrid Lagrangian bias emulator
    Ibánez, Marcos Pellejero
    Angulo, Raul E.
    Peacock, John A.
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2024, 534 (04) : 3595 - 3611
  • [42] Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Cosmological constraints from the power spectrum
    Pezzotta, Andrea
    Crocce, Martin
    Eggemeier, Alexander
    Sanchez, Ariel G.
    Scoccimarro, Roman
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 104 (04)
  • [43] Assembly bias in the local PNG halo bias and its implication for fNL constraints
    Lazeyras, Titouan
    Barreira, Alexandre
    Schmidt, Fabian
    Desjacques, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2023, (01):
  • [44] Non-linear bias of cosmological halo formation in the early universe
    Ahn, Kyungjin
    Iliev, Ilian T.
    Shapiro, Paul R.
    Srisawat, Chaichalit
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 450 (02) : 1486 - 1502
  • [45] Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Lyα forest and galaxy bias:: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy -: art. no. 103515
    Seljak, U
    Makarov, A
    McDonald, P
    Anderson, SF
    Bahcall, NA
    Brinkmann, J
    Burles, S
    Cen, R
    Doi, M
    Gunn, JE
    Ivezic, Z
    Kent, S
    Loveday, J
    Lupton, RH
    Munn, JA
    Nichol, RC
    Ostriker, JP
    Schlegel, DJ
    Schneider, DP
    Tegmark, M
    Berk, DEV
    Weinberg, DH
    York, DG
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2005, 71 (10):
  • [46] How Are Galaxies Assigned to Halos? Searching for Assembly Bias in the SDSS Galaxy Clustering
    Vakili, Mohammadjavad
    Hahn, ChangHoon
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 872 (01):
  • [47] DETECTION OF THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AND HALO ASSEMBLY BIAS OF MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS
    More, Surhud
    Miyatake, Hironao
    Takada, Masahiro
    Diemer, Benedikt
    Kravtsov, Andrey V.
    Dalal, Neal K.
    More, Anupreeta
    Murata, Ryoma
    Mandelbaum, Rachel
    Rozo, Eduardo
    Rykoff, Eli S.
    Oguri, Masamune
    Spergel, David N.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 825 (01):
  • [48] DESI mock challenge Halo and galaxy catalogues with the bias assignment method
    Balaguera-Antolinez, Andres
    Kitaura, Francisco-Shu
    Alam, Shadab
    Chuang, Chia-Hsun
    Yu, Yu
    Favole, Ginevra
    Sinigaglia, Francesco
    Zhao, Cheng
    Brooks, David
    de la Macorra, Axel
    Font-Ribera, Andreu
    Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A.
    Honscheid, Klaus
    Kehoe, Robert
    Meisner, Aron
    Miquel, Ramon
    Tarle, Gregory
    Vargas-Magana, Mariana
    Zhou, Zhimin
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2023, 673
  • [49] The scale dependence of relative galaxy bias: Encouragement for the "halo model'' description
    Blanton, Michael R.
    Eisenstein, Daniel
    Hogg, David W.
    Zehavi, Idit
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 645 (02): : 977 - 985
  • [50] The dependence of the galaxy stellar-to-halo mass relation on galaxy morphology
    Correa, Camila A.
    Schaye, Joop
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 499 (03) : 3578 - 3593