Depositional age, provenance, and tectonic setting of the Neoproterozoic Sibao Group, southeastern Yangtze Block, South China

被引:242
|
作者
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Zhou, Mei-Fu [1 ]
Yan, Dan-Ping [2 ]
Li, Jian-Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Earth Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Earth Sci & Resources, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, State Key Lab Geol Proc & Mineral Resources, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
Neoproterozoic; Detrital zircon; U-Pb geochronology; Geochemistry; Provenance; Sibao Group; Yangtze Block; South China; U-PB ZIRCON; ARCHEAN CRUSTAL EVOLUTION; GA CONTINENTAL-CRUST; MANTLE PLUME BENEATH; HF-ISOTOPE EVIDENCE; GEOCHEMICAL EVIDENCE; MAFIC INTRUSIONS; SICHUAN PROVINCE; NORTHERN MARGIN; GREENSTONE-BELT;
D O I
10.1016/j.precamres.2011.10.010
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The Sibao Group on the southeastern margin of the Yangtze Block of South China is composed mainly of flysch turbidites up to ca. 4000 m thick. Sandstones from the Sibao Group have intermediate to high SiO2 (58.6-80.0 wt%, average 68.2 wt%) and Al2O3 wt% (7.4-20.6 wt%, average 15 wt%), typical of immature lithic varieties. Both sandstones and mudstones contain high K2O (1.41-6.28 wt%) but extremely low Na2O (0.03-1.49 wt%). Positive correlations between Al2O3 and Fe2O3(T), TiO2, MgO and K2O, significant depletion of Ca, Na and Sr relative to upper continental crust and high PIA and pre-metasomatism CIA values suggest that intensive chemical weathering of the source area. Variable Cr/Th (3.9-37.0) and Co/Th (0.2-3.2) ratios indicate a source with predominant felsic and minor mafic components. Discrimination diagrams involving Ti, Al, Fe, La, Th, Sc, Hf and Co reveal the source with multiple lithologies consisting mainly of TM-like, granitic, andesitic and felsic volcanic rocks. Predominant detrital zircons have Neoproterozoic ages from 822 to 980 Ma, whereas the remaining zircons define two age groups at 1.35-2.22 Ga and 2.32-2.86 Ga. Twenty-six of the youngest grains have a weighted mean age of 835.3 +/- 3.6 Ma, tentatively interpreted as the maximum depositional age of the Sibao Group. Neoproterozoic zircon grains have variable Hf-177/Hf-176 ratios (0.281194 to 0.282564) and epsilon(Hf(t)) values (-35.9 to 9.8), indicative of the involvement of juvenile and ancient recycled components. The 1.4 and 1.8 Ga zircon grains have variable Hf-177/Hf-176 ratios (0.280947-0.281874), probably reflecting the growth of the supercontinent Columbia and suggesting that the Yangtze Block was separated from Columbia as an independent terrane at around 1.4 Ga. The complicated provenance involving felsic to intermediate rocks and Neoproterozoic juvenile to Neoarchean mature materials suggests that the Neoproterozoic Sibao Group was deposited in a back-arc foreland basin related to the northward (present coordinate) subduction of an oceanic lithosphere beneath the southeastern Yangtze Block. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 124
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Provenance and tectonic setting of the Yimianpo Group in the southeastern Songnen-Zhangguangcai Range Block: constraints on the closure of the Mudanjiang Ocean
    Zhong, Mishan
    Liu, Jin
    Liu, Zhenghong
    Chen, Jundian
    Yu, Hongchao
    Wang, Haipeng
    Lu, Junshi
    Wu, Zijie
    Pan, Mingchen
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Yilong
    GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL, 2023, 27 (04) : 415 - 434
  • [42] Provenance and tectonic setting of the Neoproterozoic meta-sedimentary rocks at southeastern Tibetan Plateau: Implications for the tectonic affinity of Yidun terrane
    Tian, Zhen-Dong
    Leng, Cheng-Biao
    Zhang, Xing-Chun
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2020, 344
  • [43] Provenance and depositional age of Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the Kuluketage Block, northern Tarim Craton: Implications for tectonic setting and crustal growth
    Long, Xiaoping
    Wilde, Simon A.
    Yuan, Chao
    Hu, Aiqin
    Sun, Min
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2015, 260 : 76 - 90
  • [44] Latest Mesoproterozoic provenance shift in the southwestern Yangtze Block, South China: Insights into tectonic evolution in the context of the supercontinent cycle
    Cui, Xiaozhuang
    Lin, Shoufa
    Wang, Jian
    Ren, Guangming
    Su, Bingrui
    Chen, Fenglin
    Deng, Qi
    Pang, Weihua
    GONDWANA RESEARCH, 2021, 99 : 131 - 148
  • [45] Tectonics of the Neoproterozoic basin and age of the Macaoyuan Group on the northern margin of the Yangtze Block
    Li L.
    Wang Z.
    Xiao A.
    Hu A.
    Chen Y.
    Wang Q.
    Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29 (06) : 291 - 304
  • [46] Detrital zircon U-Pb ages of metasedimentary rocks from the Neoproterozoic Zhoutan Group in the northern Cathaysia Block (South China): Provenance and tectonic implications
    Hui, Bo
    Dong, Yunpeng
    Neubauer, Franz
    He, Shuai
    Varga, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 63 (09) : 1132 - 1152
  • [47] Geochronology and Tectonic Significance of Neoproterozoic Volcanic Rocks from Yanbian Group in Western Yangtze Block
    Liu P.
    Zhang J.
    Ding X.
    Liu Y.
    Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2023, 48 (12): : 4508 - 4526
  • [48] Provenance and depositional mechanism analyses of the Yangtianba Formation, northwestern margin of the Yangtze Block, southwestern China
    Gao, Feng
    Pei, Xianzhi
    Li, Ruibao
    Li, Zuochen
    Pei, Lei
    Chen, Youxin
    Wang, Meng
    Zhao, Shaowei
    Liu, Chengjun
    Li, Xiaobing
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2020, 138
  • [49] U-Pb Zircon Age, Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Compositions of Neoproterozoic Granitoids in Northwestern Margin of Yangtze Block (South China): Implications for Neoproterozoic Tectonic Evolution
    Liu Rong
    Zhang Benren
    Zhang Hongfei
    Yuan Honglin
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) : 659 - 680
  • [50] Tectonic Settings and Geological Implications of Neoproterozoic Liujiaping VMS Deposit, Northwestern Yangtze Block, China
    Su, Yanping
    Zhang, Baolin
    Zhang, Guoliang
    Xu, Xingwang
    Liu, Ruilin
    RESOURCE GEOLOGY, 2017, 67 (01) : 89 - 102