Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates

被引:2
|
作者
Keswani, Rajesh N. [1 ]
Wood, Mariah [1 ]
Benson, Mark [2 ]
Gawron, Andrew J. [3 ,4 ]
Kahi, Charles [5 ]
Kaltenbach, Tonya [6 ]
Yadlapati, Rena [7 ]
Gregory, Dyanna [1 ]
Duloy, Anna [8 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Utah, Gastroenterol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Salt Lake City VA Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Gastroenterol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Gastroenterol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Gastroenterol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
WITHDRAWAL TECHNIQUE; INDICATORS; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/a-1529-5574
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding ("baseline") and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (<= 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %-53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %-24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P < 0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %, P = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %, P = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. Conclusions CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists.
引用
收藏
页码:E232 / E237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bi-Institutional Colonoscopy Quality Report Card Improves Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates
    Wan, David
    Krigel, Anna
    Schnoll-Sussman, Felice
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S306 - S307
  • [22] Adenoma detection rate as a quality criterion for colonoscopy
    Klein, Friederike
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2022, 60 (09): : 1296 - 1297
  • [23] Colonoscopy Scheduling Influences Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates
    Paeck, Kyung Hyun
    Heo, Woon Je
    Park, Dong Il
    Kim, Young-Ho
    Lee, Suck-Ho
    Lee, Chang Kyun
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Han, Dong Soo
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (127) : 1647 - 1652
  • [24] The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates
    Madhoun, Mohammad F.
    Tierney, William M.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [25] Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy according to Indication
    Boroff, Erika S.
    Disbrow, Molly
    Crowell, Michael D.
    Ramirez, Francisco C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2017, 2017
  • [26] Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rates for trainees
    Singh, Shailendra
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (06): : 2243 - 2244
  • [27] Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rates for trainees
    Shailendra Singh
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 2243 - 2244
  • [28] Adenoma, Serrated Adenoma and Modified Serrated Adenoma Detection Rates on Screening Colonoscopy
    Agyepong, Joseph
    Javaid, Asad
    Steinbrunner, Jennifer
    Kindel, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S141 - S142
  • [29] Artificial intelligence improves adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy
    Schauer, Cameron
    Chieng, Michael
    Wang, Michael
    Neave, Michelle
    Watson, Sarah
    Van Rijnsoever, Marius
    Walmsley, Russell
    Jafer, Ali
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (1561) : 22 - 30
  • [30] Documentation of withdrawal time improves adenoma detection during colonoscopy
    Sinn, Dong Hyun
    Chang, Dong Kyung
    Choi, Won-Seok
    Lee, Jun Haeng
    Kim, Young-Ho
    Son, Hee Jung
    Rhee, Poong-Lyul
    Kinn, Jae J.
    Rhee, Jong Chul
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB297 - AB297