Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates

被引:2
|
作者
Keswani, Rajesh N. [1 ]
Wood, Mariah [1 ]
Benson, Mark [2 ]
Gawron, Andrew J. [3 ,4 ]
Kahi, Charles [5 ]
Kaltenbach, Tonya [6 ]
Yadlapati, Rena [7 ]
Gregory, Dyanna [1 ]
Duloy, Anna [8 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Utah, Gastroenterol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Salt Lake City VA Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Gastroenterol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Gastroenterol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Gastroenterol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
WITHDRAWAL TECHNIQUE; INDICATORS; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/a-1529-5574
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding ("baseline") and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (<= 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %-53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %-24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P < 0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %, P = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %, P = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. Conclusions CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists.
引用
收藏
页码:E232 / E237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INDIVIDUALIZED FEEDBACK ON COLONOSCOPY SKILLS IMPROVES GROUP COLONOSCOPY QUALITY IN PROVIDERS WITH LOWER ADENOMA DETECTION RATES (ADR)
    Duloy, Anna
    Wood, Mariah
    Benson, Mark
    Gawron, Andrew J.
    Kahi, Charles J.
    Kaltenbach, Tonya R.
    Yadlapati, Rena H.
    Gregory, Dyanna L.
    Keswani, Rajesh N.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB53 - AB53
  • [2] Individualized Audit and Feedback Improves Colonoscopy Quality Indicators
    Aleksandrovich, Yauheni
    Melquist, Stephanie J.
    Bassett, John
    Guerrero, Dubert
    Bates, Kari
    Sang, Hilla
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S238 - S239
  • [3] The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates
    Sherer, Eric A.
    Imler, Timothy D.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (03) : 545 - 553
  • [4] IMPACT OF INDIVIDUAL COLONOSCOPY QUALITY SCORECARDS ON ADENOMA DETECTION RATES
    Ren, Yi-Ping
    Lee, Jonathan Wei-Jie
    Koh, Calvin
    Lim, Li-Lin
    Wong, Reuben Kong-Min
    Cheong, Wai-Kit
    Tan, Ker-Kan
    Lee, Soh-Ee
    Zhu, Feng
    Yeoh, Khay-Guan
    GUT, 2022, 71 : A158 - A158
  • [5] Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates
    Lee, Robert H.
    Tang, Raymond S.
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Ho, Samuel B.
    Shah, Nimeesh K.
    Wetzel, Laura
    Bain, Andrew S.
    Mackintosh, Erin E.
    Paek, Aeri M.
    Crissien, Ana Maria
    Saraf, Lida Jafari
    Kalmaz, Denise M.
    Savides, Thomas J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (01) : 128 - 134
  • [6] The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates
    Deng, Bin
    Zhi, Jiehua
    Chen, Yaosheng
    Liang, Lanyu
    Wu, Jian
    Gao, Xuefen
    Xiao, Weiming
    Ding, Yanbing
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [7] INCREASING VIGILANCE DURING COLONOSCOPY IMPROVES ADENOMA DETECTION RATES (ADR)
    Wazir, Shehzad
    Catalano, Marc F.
    Lajin, Michael
    Khan, Naser M.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S781 - S781
  • [8] Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy
    Park, Soo-Kyung
    Kim, Hyun-Young
    Lee, Chang Kyun
    Cha, Jae Myung
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Han, Dong Soo
    Lee, Bo-In
    Shin, Jeong Eun
    Park, Dong Il
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 51 (07) : 886 - 890
  • [9] A novel coding analytic improves the assessment of adenoma and serrated polyp detection rates for colonoscopy quality standards in a large tertiary colonoscopy service
    Chew, M.
    Anderson, B.
    Swansson, W.
    Garg, M.
    Lewis, D.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 248 - 249
  • [10] Colonoscopy: artificial Intelligence improves Adenoma Detection
    Lorenz, Judith
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2019, 57 (01): : 16 - +