Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Association of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Parameters with Histopathologic Findings

被引:1
|
作者
Abedi, Iraj [1 ]
Tavakkoli, Mohammad Bagher [1 ]
Rabbani, Masoud [2 ]
Jabbari, Keyvan [1 ]
Sirous, Mehri [2 ]
Far, Ghasem Yadegar [3 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Med Phys Fac, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Radiol Fac, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Hlth Fac, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate Cancer; Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Parameters; Histopathologic; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; GLEASON SCORE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; GRADE; SPECIMENS; TISSUE;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.37844
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Prostate cancer continues to be diagnosed with increasing frequency. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) has a favorable correlation with prostatectomy histopathology findings. These advanced functional imaging techniques may help increase the sensitivity of prostate cancer detection and the accuracy of predicting the Gleason score (GS), which is a measure of cancer aggressiveness. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine associations between MP-MRI parameter and whole-mount pathological finding as reference standard. Patients and Methods: Twenty-four consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent an MRI exam followed by radical prostatectomy were incorporated in this study. The average time between MRI and prostatectomy was 40 days (7 - 100 days). All patients had biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate and the mean GS was 6.7 (median, 7; range 6 - 9). Results: The mean age was 59 +/- 7 years. The mean serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 7.81 +/- 5.73 ng/mL. The GS ranged from 6 to 9 and most patients (79%) had a GS of 7. MRI data were correlated to biopsy results. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between GS and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements (r = -0.926, P = 0. 01), and a strong positive correlation between Gleason scores and MRS measurements (r = 0.965, P = 0.01). No significant correlation was observed between any of the dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters and GS. Conclusion: Combining anatomical and functional MRI significantly improves prostate cancer localization. It is a useful tool in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer as well as a valid tool for assessing men on active surveillance. However, it should not be seen as a replacement for tissue biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INCIDENTAL FINDINGS ON MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE PROSTATE: PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
    Martins, Tatiana
    Bohrer, Yves
    Mussi, Thais
    Baroni, Ronaldo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E1079 - E1079
  • [22] Association of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters with histological findings from MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
    Dianat, Seyed Saeid
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Hamper, Ulrike M.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) : 7965 - 7972
  • [23] DETECTION OF INDIVIDUAL PROSTATE CANCER FOCI BY MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Johnson, David
    Raman, Steven
    Mirak, Sohrab
    Kwan, Lorna
    Bajgiran, Amirhossein
    Faeina, Izak
    Pooli, Aydin
    Salmasi, Amirali
    Sisk, Anthony
    Felker, Ely
    Lu, David
    Reiter, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E423 - E424
  • [24] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A review and update for urologists
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    Jeong, In Gab
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 56 (07) : 487 - 497
  • [25] Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection and Prediction of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, He
    Zhao, Chenglin
    Hu, Juan
    Jiang, Yuanyuan
    Tong, Yanjun
    Liu, Ting
    Huang, Rong
    Wang, Xiaoying
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [26] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Current role in prostate cancer management
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Bist, Vipul
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Tanaka, Utaru
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    Takahashi, Satoru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 550 - 557
  • [27] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Haider, M. A.
    Yao, X.
    Loblaw, A.
    Finelli, A.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 550 - 567
  • [28] Cost consideration in utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    Hutchinson, Ryan
    Lotan, Yair
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 345 - 354
  • [29] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Haddad, Ahmed Q.
    Costa, Daniel
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Rofsky, Neil
    Roehrborn, Claus
    Lotan, Yair
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E180 - E180
  • [30] Imaging diagnosis in Focal Therapy for prostate cancer: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lista Mateos, Fernando
    Castillo Gallo, Ernesto
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2016, 69 (06): : 291 - 301