共 50 条
Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability After Switching From Immediate or Prolonged-Release to Extended-Release Formulation, After an Organ Transplantation
被引:5
|作者:
Del Bello, Arnaud
[1
,2
,3
]
Gaible, Clotilde
[1
]
Longlune, Nathalie
[1
]
Hebral, Anne-Laure
[1
]
Esposito, Laure
[1
]
Gandia, Peggy
[4
,5
]
Kamar, Nassim
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] CHU Rangueil, Dept Nephrol & Organ Transplantat, Toulouse, France
[2] CHU Purpan, IFRBMT, INSERM, U1043, Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
[4] Toulouse Univ Hosp, Pharmacokinet & Toxicol Lab, Toulouse, France
[5] Univ Toulouse, ENVT, INRAE, INTHERES, Toulouse, France
关键词:
tacrolimus variability;
solid organ transplantation;
tacrolimus formulation;
extended-release tacrolimus;
outcomes;
rejection;
ANTIBODY-MEDIATED REJECTION;
TWICE-DAILY TACROLIMUS;
TROUGH BLOOD-LEVELS;
ALLOGRAFT PATHOLOGY;
PATIENT VARIABILITY;
KIDNEY;
EXPOSURE;
D O I:
10.3389/fphar.2021.602764
中图分类号:
R9 [药学];
学科分类号:
1007 ;
摘要:
Background and Purpose: Several formulations of tacrolimus are available, but evidence of the benefit of changing to the most recent formulations is lacking. Tacrolimus intra-patient variability (tacrolimus IPV) is an emerging risk factor associated with poor graft outcomes after solid organ transplantations. Here, we examined the modifications of tacrolimus IPV after switching to a different formulation of tacrolimus. Experimental Approach: We identified 353 solid organ transplant recipients that were switched in our center from immediate-release (IR-tacrolimus) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-tacrolimus) to extended-release, LCP-tacrolimus (LCP-tacrolimus). Among them, 54 patients underwent at least 3 available tacrolimus blood concentrations before and after the switch, allowing us to investigate tacrolimus IPV. Key Results: The switch was considered as a safe procedure since only four of the 353 patients presented a graft rejection after the switch, and no patient was hospitalized for tacrolimus overdose. The tacrolimus IPV estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV-IPV) was stable before and after the switch to LCP-tacrolimus (CV-IPV: 29.0% (IQR 25-75 (15.5; 38.5) before and 24.0% (15.8; 36.5) after the switch, p = 0.65). Conclusion and Implications: Switching from IR- or PR-tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus is a safe procedure. However, the CV-tacrolimus IPV was not impacted by the change of formulation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文