Postpartum Readmission for Hypertension After Discharge on Labetalol or Nifedipine

被引:6
|
作者
Do, Samantha C.
Leonard, Stephanie A.
Kan, Peiyi
Panelli, Danielle M.
Girsen, Anna, I
Lyell, Deirdre J.
El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
Druzin, Maurice L.
Herrero, Tiffany
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med & Obstet, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Perinatal Epidemiol & Hlth Outcomes Res Unit,Div, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
DISORDERS; PREGNANCY; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004918
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether readmission for hypertension by 6 weeks postpartum differed between patients discharged on nifedipine or labetalol. METHODS: This cohort study included patients with delivery admissions from 2006 to 2017 who were discharged from the hospital on nifedipine or labetalol and were included in a large, national adjudicated claims database. We identified patients' discharge medication based on filled outpatient prescriptions. We compared rates of hospital readmission for hypertension between patients discharged postpartum on labetalol alone, nifedipine alone, or combined nifedipine and labetalol. Patients with chronic hypertension without superimposed preeclampsia were excluded. Comparisons based on medication were performed using logistic regression models with adjustment for prespecified confounders. Comparisons were also stratified by hypertensive disorder of pregnancy severity. RESULTS: Among 1,582,335 patients overall, 14,112 (0.89%) were discharged postpartum on labetalol, 9,001 (0.57%) on nifedipine, and 1,364 (0.09%) on both medications. Postpartum readmissions for hypertension were more frequent for patients discharged on labetalol compared with nifedipine (641 patients vs 185 patients, 4.5% vs 2.1%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.43-1.85). Readmissions for hypertension were more frequent for patients discharged on labetalol compared with nifedipine for both mild (4.5% vs 2.7%, aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.29-1.93) and severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (261 patients vs 72 patients, 5.7% vs 3.2%, aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.43-1.85). Readmissions for hypertension were more frequent on combined nifedipine and labetalol compared with nifedipine (3.1% vs 2.1%), but the odds were lower after confounder adjustment (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99). CONCLUSION: Postpartum discharge on labetalol was associated with increased risk of readmission for hypertension compared with discharge on nifedipine.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 598
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pregnancy Outcomes of Nifedipine Compared With Labetalol for Oral Treatment of Mild Chronic Hypertension
    Sanusi, Ayodeji A.
    Leach, Justin
    Boggess, Kim
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    Sibai, Baha
    Lawrence, Kirsten
    Hughes, Brenna L.
    Bell, Joseph
    Aagaard, Kjersti
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    Gibson, Kelly S.
    Haas, David M.
    Plante, Lauren
    Metz, Torri D.
    Casey, Brian
    Esplin, Sean
    Longo, Sherri
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Saade, George R.
    Hoppe, Kara K.
    Foroutan, Janelle
    Tuuli, Methodius
    Owens, Michelle Y.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Frey, Heather
    Rosen, Todd
    Palatnik, Anna
    Baker, Susan
    August, Phyllis
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Su, Emily J.
    Krishna, Iris
    Nguyen, Nguyet A.
    Norton, Mary E.
    Skupski, Daniel
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Ogunyemi, Dotun
    Galis, Zorina S.
    Harper, Lorie
    Ambalavanan, Namasivayam
    Geller, Nancy L.
    Kuo, Hui-Chien
    Sinkey, Rachel G.
    Librizzi, Ronald
    Pereira, Leonardo
    Magann, Everett F.
    Habli, Mounira
    Williams, Shauna
    Mari, Giancarlo
    Pridjian, Gabriella
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 144 (01): : 126 - 134
  • [32] A COMPARISON OF NIFEDIPINE AND LABETALOL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    VERMA, SP
    SILKE, B
    TAYLOR, SH
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1985, 3 : S555 - S556
  • [33] To study the changes in fetal hemodynamics with intravenous labetalol or nifedipine in acute severe hypertension
    Gainder, Shalini
    Thakur, Monika
    Saha, S. C.
    Prakash, Mahesh
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2019, 15 : 12 - 15
  • [34] Gestational weight gain among gravidae with hypertension receiving labetalol versus nifedipine
    Bastian, Ingmar N.
    Antony, Kathleen M.
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2022, 28 : 121 - 122
  • [35] The effect of labetalol and nifedipine MR on blood pressure in women with chronic hypertension in pregnancy
    Shawkat, E.
    Mistry, H.
    Chmiel, C.
    Webster, L.
    Chappell, L.
    Johnstone, E. D.
    Myers, J. E.
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2018, 11 : 92 - 98
  • [36] To study the changes in maternal hemodynamics with intravenous labetalol or nifedipine in acute severe hypertension
    Thakur, Monika
    Gainder, Shalini
    Saha, S. C.
    Prakash, Mahesh
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2020, 21 : 180 - 183
  • [37] Cost comparison of readmission versus proactive management of postpartum hypertensive disease with nifedipine
    Rudnik, Alexis L.
    Dahlke, Joshua
    Lovgren, Todd R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S85 - S85
  • [38] Predictive modeling of postpartum readmission for hypertension: A retrospective study
    Larson, Ramsey G.
    Mei, Chaoqun
    Mukhtarova, Narmin
    Chen, Yu-Hsin
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    Hoppe, Kara K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S84 - S84
  • [39] The patient experience of a postpartum readmission for hypertension: a qualitative study
    Viswanathan, Radhika
    Little, Sarah E.
    Wilkins-Haug, Louise
    Seely, Ellen W.
    Berhie, Saba H.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [40] Hospital readmission after postpartum discharge of tern newborns in two maternity wards in Stockholm and Marseille
    Boubred, F.
    Herlenius, E.
    Andres, V.
    des Robert, C.
    Marchini, G.
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2016, 23 (03): : 234 - 240