When good diagnostics go bad - Why maturation is still hard

被引:0
|
作者
Wilmering, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Boeing Co, St Louis, MO 63166 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Maturation is a vital, integral, difficult, and oft-overlooked part of the Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) and Integrated Diagnostics (ID) processes. The effort to mature a system begins at conceptual design and continues throughout the system life cycle. Once initial system designs have been deployed and begun operation, they must be monitored for correctness and effectiveness within the context of their operational environment. In this paper I will: (1) discuss maturation as an integral part of the IVHM and ID processes, (2) suggest an integrated information framework based on a logical theory of product usage that supports innovative maturation application development, (3) present some of the issues that present technical and organizational impediments to obtaining and representing the knowledge required for development of maturation applications, (4) describe how the approach presented here can address some of these issues, and (5) discuss declarative knowledge representation and application development approaches to address the peculiar demands of the maturation domain. The ideas presented will support development of flexible, growth-oriented applications suitable to support product usage analysis throughout the operational portion of its life cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:3137 / 3147
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] When Good Drugs Go Bad: Azathioprine Hypersensitivity
    Sears, S. P.
    Harris, D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [42] Workfare: Why good social policy ideas go bad
    Hirschl, TA
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2004, 33 (01) : 78 - 80
  • [43] Workfare: Why good social policy ideas go bad
    McElligott, G
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2003, 46 (02): : 269 - 271
  • [44] Workfare: Why good social policy ideas go bad
    Little, M
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2004, 37 (03): : 750 - 751
  • [45] Workfare: Why good social policy ideas go bad
    Hardina, D
    [J]. SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 2003, 77 (03) : 481 - 484
  • [46] Workfare: Why good social policy ideas go bad
    Sarlo, C
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2003, 29 (03): : 379 - 380
  • [47] Synchronization in Multilayer Networks: When Good Links Go Bad
    Belykh, Igor
    Carter, Douglas
    Jeter, Russell
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 18 (04): : 2267 - 2302
  • [48] The miscommunicative cardiac cell - When good proteins go bad
    Gomes, AV
    Venkatraman, G
    Potter, JD
    [J]. COMMUNICATIVE CARDIAC CELL, 2005, 1047 : 30 - 37
  • [49] When good things go bad - The reflex physiology of defense
    Bradley, MM
    Moulder, B
    Lang, PJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (06) : 468 - 473
  • [50] The question authority - When good TV execs go bad
    Gunther, M
    Darnell, M
    [J]. FORTUNE, 2002, 145 (10) : 34 - 34