The analysis of Key Comparison Reference Value and its uncertainty using Markov Chain Monte Carlo method

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Haiyun [1 ]
Xu, Dinghua [1 ]
Liu, Jianli [2 ]
Zhao, Tiepeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Metrol, Div Energy & Environm Measurement, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Inst Metrol, Div Electromagnet Compatibil, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] China Acad Bldg Res, Architectural Design Inst, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
关键词
Key Comparison; Key Comparison Reference Value (KCRV); Uncertainty; Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC);
D O I
10.1117/12.2511633
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The analysis of Key Comparison data is to determine the Key Comparison Reference Value (KCRV) and its uncertainty. In the current model, the weighted mean is used as KCRV which is put forward by M, G, Cox. However, the method qualifies the measurement results as Gaussian distribution and does not apply to T distribution or other, which causes the risks of chi-square test failure. When the data analysis is invalid based on conventional statistics, the Bayesian approach may be a valid and welcome alternative. Bayesian inference is often required to solve high-dimensional integrations which Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is such a method. Here is a simple example used to illustrate the application of this method in metrology. The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is the most flexible and efficient algorithm in MCMC method. In this paper, its basic concepts are explained and the algorithm steps are given. Besides, we obtain the KCRV and its uncertainty using the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm through MATLAB. Then, the convergence of MCMC is diagnosed. In principle, the MCMC method works for any starting value and any proposal distribution. In practice, however, both choices affect performance. We illustrate this influence with the example.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reference Value Decision based on Monte Carlo Method in an International Key Comparison
    Chen Ping
    Chen Haibin
    Yang Fan
    Lu Mei
    Ren Xiaoping
    [J]. 2022 41ST CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2022, : 5940 - 5944
  • [2] Uncertainty quantification and value of information assessment using proxies and Markov chain Monte Carlo method for a pilot project
    Chen, Bailian
    He, Jincong
    Wen, Xian-Huan
    Chen, Wen
    Reynolds, Albert C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 157 : 328 - 339
  • [3] Markov chain Monte Carlo method and its application
    Brooks, SP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1998, 47 (01) : 69 - 100
  • [4] Comparison of KCRV and Its Uncertainty of CCM Key Comparisons by Monte Carlo Method
    Lee, S.
    Chung, J. W.
    Choi, I. M.
    [J]. MAPAN-JOURNAL OF METROLOGY SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2015, 30 (04): : 267 - 271
  • [5] Comparison of KCRV and Its Uncertainty of CCM Key Comparisons by Monte Carlo Method
    S. Lee
    J. W. Chung
    I. M. Choi
    [J]. MAPAN, 2015, 30 : 267 - 271
  • [6] Seismic inversion and uncertainty quantification using transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo method
    Zhu, Dehan
    Gibson, Richard
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (04) : R321 - R334
  • [7] Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models
    Daniel W. Heck
    Antony M. Overstall
    Quentin F. Gronau
    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
    [J]. Statistics and Computing, 2019, 29 : 631 - 643
  • [8] Dynamic evaluation and analysis of the uncertainty of roundness error measurement by Markov Chain Monte Carlo method
    Zhang, Ke
    Su, Kailun
    Yao, Yunhan
    Li, Qingsong
    Chen, Suan
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2022, 201
  • [9] Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models
    Heck, Daniel W.
    Overstall, Antony M.
    Gronau, Quentin F.
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    [J]. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2019, 29 (04) : 631 - 643
  • [10] Slope Stability Analysis Using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method
    Fattahi, Hadi
    Ilghani, Nastaran Zandy
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 38 (03) : 2609 - 2618