Access-site complications after rescue percutaneous coronary intervention during thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction

被引:3
|
作者
Germing, A [1 ]
Lindstaedt, M [1 ]
Ulrich, S [1 ]
Bojara, W [1 ]
Lawo, T [1 ]
Mügge, A [1 ]
Grewe, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Med Klin 2, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannsheil, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE | 2005年 / 94卷 / 01期
关键词
access-site complications; thrombolysis; percutaneous coronary intervention;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-005-0162-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
El Summary Aggressive antithrombotic medical therapy may increase the rate of access-site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Frequently, emergency coronary interventions have to be performed in a situation when thrombolysis therapy was administered as the first-line therapeutic approach in acute myocardial infarction but failed to achieve stable conditions. We analyzed the rate of femoral bleeding complications after emergency coronary intervention in 76 consecutive patients with unsuccessful thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. All invasive procedures were performed in a time period no longer than eight hours after thrombolysis was administered. Additional antithrombotic therapy with heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-inhibitors was given during intervention in 100% and 38.2% of patients, respectively. in three patients (3.9%) femoral hematomas without therapeutic consequences were documented; one patient (1.3%) developed a hematoma requiring blood transfusion. A pseudoaneurysm, fistula or surgical vascular intervention did not occur. Coronary interventional procedures in rescue situations can be performed with excellent safety with respect to access-site bleeding complications even under anti-conditions of ongoing thrombolysis therapy and aggressive anti- thrombotic medical regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 27
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antecedent thrombolytic therapy followed by planned rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction, compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Hasuda, T
    Shimizu, M
    Satoh, T
    Kanae, K
    Taniguchi, I
    Shibata, T
    Yoshida, S
    Mochizuki, S
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 197 - 197
  • [22] SURVIVAL BENEFIT OF THE LATE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN THE PATIENTS AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WHO ARE OR WHO ARE NOT TREATED WITH THROMBOLYSIS
    Knezevic, Bozidarka
    Bulatovic, Nebojsa
    Belada, Natasa
    Ivanovic, Vesna
    Dragnic, Sinisa
    Rabrenovic, Miroslav
    Nikolic, Goran
    Music, Ljilja
    Boskovic, Aneta
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 9 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [23] Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction
    Sayre, MR
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (03): : 27S - 32S
  • [24] Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
    Singh, Kanwar P.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 91 (04) : 639 - +
  • [25] Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
    Komocsi, A.
    Vorobcsuk, A.
    Aradi, D.
    INTERVENTIONAL MEDICINE AND APPLIED SCIENCE, 2010, 2 (02): : 53 - 58
  • [26] Predictors of access-site complications among patients treated with femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions
    Cura, FA
    Roffi, M
    Albirini, A
    Schneider, JP
    Raymond, RR
    Franco, I
    Silver, MS
    Yadav, JS
    Withlow, PL
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 425 - 425
  • [27] A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Schömig, A
    Ndrepepa, G
    Mehilli, J
    Dirschinger, J
    Nekolla, SG
    Schmitt, C
    Martinoff, S
    Seyfarth, M
    Schwaiger, M
    Kastrati, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (10) : 2073 - 2079
  • [28] Vascular access site complications post percutaneous coronary intervention
    Hurley, EJ
    Lennon, R
    Verghese, M
    Singh, M
    Holmes, DR
    Bell, MR
    Rihal, CS
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 95A - 96A
  • [29] In the treatment of the acute myocardial infarction, the primary percutaneous coronary intervention show us better in-hospital results than the rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after thrombolisis
    Cantarelli, M.
    Gioppato, S.
    Guimaraes, J. B.
    Ribeiro, E. P.
    Nardi, J.
    Gomes, R.
    Conforti, T.
    Pereda, F.
    Goncalves, R.
    Castello, H.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (12) : E218 - E218
  • [30] Predictors of Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Yuksel, Yasin
    Ayca, Burak
    Akin, Fatih
    ANGIOLOGY, 2019, 70 (07) : 672 - 672