Effective groundwater-surface water exchange at watershed scales

被引:2
|
作者
Snowdon, Andrew P. [1 ]
Craig, James R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
hydrology; groundwater; surface water; upscaling; power law; terrain; ATMOSPHERIC-HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; TABLE DYNAMICS; SOIL-MOISTURE; WEHY-HCM; MODEL; SIMULATION; PARAMETERIZATION; INFILTRATION; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.10759
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Coupled groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) models are capable of simulating complex hydrological systems when used at fine resolutions. However, properly characterizing bulk GW-SW fluxes for either coarsely resolved integrated models or basin-discretized surface water models remains a challenge. Loss of subgrid detail, while beneficially decreasing computational cost, leads to a decrease in model accuracy as scale effects become important. Ideally, coarse low-resolution models should be informed by expected subgrid behaviour, reducing the impact of scale effects. Determining how to best represent these fine-scale details in lower-resolution models is important for improving the accuracy and appropriateness of these models. To investigate some of these scale effects, we here explore the relationships between area-averaged hydraulic head and bulk GW-SW exchange fluxes (e.g. evapotranspiration and discharge), all of which are presumed to be controlled predominantly by subgrid topographic effects. These relationships may be useful for simply upscaling models without the complete loss of crucial fine-resolution subgrid details. Using finely resolved simulation output from Modflow for a fine-resolution simulation and post-processed results generated to represent coarser resolutions, upscaled flux relationships (UFRs) are generated for multiple terrains; these UFRs define the relationships that exist between average hydraulic head and average fluxes in unconfined aquifer systems. It is found that, for steady-flow regimes, similar one-to-one power law relationships consistently exist between area-averaged hydraulic heads, exchange fluxes and saturated area for a variety of terrains. Additionally, when the averaged values are properly normalized, the generated steady-state UFRs for a single terrain are independent of hydraulic conductivity and potential evapotranspiration rates and apparently insensitive to the presence of mild heterogeneity. While some hysteresis is apparent in the relationships under transient conditions, transient artefacts are shown to be minor under some circumstances, indicating that UFRs may be applied to both steady-state and transient scenarios. Simpler tests performed under saturated and variably saturated conditions in a cross-sectional model show similar trends, suggesting that the UFR representation is extendable to systems where the vadose zone plays a significant role. It is suggested that relatively simple UFRs such as these may find use as an alternative to direct point upscaling or multi-resolution models for estimating GW-SW exchange fluxes in coarse-scale models. They also appear to justify the functional form of some classical models of baseflow and evapotranspiration used in conceptual surface water models. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1849 / 1861
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Groundwater-Surface Water Exchange Mechanism in the National Water Model over the Northern High Plains Aquifer, USA
    Jachens, Elizabeth R.
    Hutcheson, Holly
    Thomas, Matthew B.
    Steward, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2021, 57 (02): : 241 - 255
  • [42] Modeling groundwater-surface water interactions using the Dupuit approximation
    Anderson, EI
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2005, 28 (04) : 315 - 327
  • [43] Adjoint modeling of stream depletion in groundwater-surface water systems
    Griebling, S. A.
    Neupauer, R. M.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (08) : 4971 - 4984
  • [44] Comparison of two modeling approaches for groundwater-surface water interactions
    Guay, C.
    Nastev, M.
    Paniconi, C.
    Sulis, M.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2013, 27 (16) : 2258 - 2270
  • [45] Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions: Recent Advances and Interdisciplinary Challenges
    Lewandowski, Joerg
    Meinikmann, Karin
    Krause, Stefan
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [46] Observations on groundwater-surface water interactions at River Vantaa, Finland
    Korkka-Niemi, Kirsti
    Kivimaki, Anna-Liisa
    Lahti, Kirsti
    Nygard, Maria
    Rautio, Anne
    Salonen, Veli-Pekka
    Pellikka, Petri
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2012, 23 (02) : 222 - 231
  • [47] Hyporheic hydrology: interactions at the groundwater-surface water interface Preface
    Krause, S.
    Hannah, D. M.
    Fleckenstein, J. H.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2009, 23 (15) : 2103 - 2107
  • [48] Groundwater-surface water exchange as key control for instream and groundwater nitrate concentrations along a first-order agricultural stream
    Jimenez-Fernandez, Oscar
    Schwientek, Marc
    Osenbruck, Karsten
    Glaser, Clarissa
    Schmidt, Christian
    Fleckenstein, Jan H.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2022, 36 (02)
  • [49] Flux dynamics at the groundwater-surface water interface in a tropical catchment
    Hai Manh Vu
    Shanafield, Margaret
    Batelaan, Okke
    [J]. LIMNOLOGICA, 2018, 68 : 36 - 45
  • [50] Geomorphologic control on pollutant retardation at the groundwater-surface water interface
    Smith, J. W. N.
    Lerner, D. N.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (24) : 4679 - 4694