Effective groundwater-surface water exchange at watershed scales

被引:2
|
作者
Snowdon, Andrew P. [1 ]
Craig, James R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
hydrology; groundwater; surface water; upscaling; power law; terrain; ATMOSPHERIC-HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; TABLE DYNAMICS; SOIL-MOISTURE; WEHY-HCM; MODEL; SIMULATION; PARAMETERIZATION; INFILTRATION; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.10759
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Coupled groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) models are capable of simulating complex hydrological systems when used at fine resolutions. However, properly characterizing bulk GW-SW fluxes for either coarsely resolved integrated models or basin-discretized surface water models remains a challenge. Loss of subgrid detail, while beneficially decreasing computational cost, leads to a decrease in model accuracy as scale effects become important. Ideally, coarse low-resolution models should be informed by expected subgrid behaviour, reducing the impact of scale effects. Determining how to best represent these fine-scale details in lower-resolution models is important for improving the accuracy and appropriateness of these models. To investigate some of these scale effects, we here explore the relationships between area-averaged hydraulic head and bulk GW-SW exchange fluxes (e.g. evapotranspiration and discharge), all of which are presumed to be controlled predominantly by subgrid topographic effects. These relationships may be useful for simply upscaling models without the complete loss of crucial fine-resolution subgrid details. Using finely resolved simulation output from Modflow for a fine-resolution simulation and post-processed results generated to represent coarser resolutions, upscaled flux relationships (UFRs) are generated for multiple terrains; these UFRs define the relationships that exist between average hydraulic head and average fluxes in unconfined aquifer systems. It is found that, for steady-flow regimes, similar one-to-one power law relationships consistently exist between area-averaged hydraulic heads, exchange fluxes and saturated area for a variety of terrains. Additionally, when the averaged values are properly normalized, the generated steady-state UFRs for a single terrain are independent of hydraulic conductivity and potential evapotranspiration rates and apparently insensitive to the presence of mild heterogeneity. While some hysteresis is apparent in the relationships under transient conditions, transient artefacts are shown to be minor under some circumstances, indicating that UFRs may be applied to both steady-state and transient scenarios. Simpler tests performed under saturated and variably saturated conditions in a cross-sectional model show similar trends, suggesting that the UFR representation is extendable to systems where the vadose zone plays a significant role. It is suggested that relatively simple UFRs such as these may find use as an alternative to direct point upscaling or multi-resolution models for estimating GW-SW exchange fluxes in coarse-scale models. They also appear to justify the functional form of some classical models of baseflow and evapotranspiration used in conceptual surface water models. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1849 / 1861
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Groundwater-Surface Water Exchange
    Hatch, Christine
    [J]. GROUNDWATER, 2022, 60 (06) : 709 - 709
  • [2] Validation of a new device to quantify groundwater-surface water exchange
    Cremeans, Mackenzie M.
    Devlin, J. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2017, 206 : 75 - 80
  • [3] A Comparison of Tools and Methods for Estimating Groundwater-Surface Water Exchange
    Cremeans, M. M.
    Devlin, J. F.
    Osorno, T. C.
    McKnight, U. S.
    Bjerg, P. L.
    [J]. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2020, 40 (01): : 24 - 34
  • [4] Crab burrows as conduits for groundwater-surface water exchange in Bangladesh
    Stahl, Mason O.
    Tarek, M. H.
    Yeo, Darren C. J.
    Badruzzaman, A. B. M.
    Harvey, Charles F.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (23) : 8342 - 8347
  • [5] Groundwater-surface water interactions in a lowland watershed: source contribution to stream flow
    Garrett, C. Guinn
    Vulava, Vijay M.
    Callahan, Timothy J.
    Jones, Martin L.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2012, 26 (21) : 3195 - 3206
  • [6] New techniques for evaluating water and contaminant exchange at the groundwater-surface water interface
    Chadwick, DB
    Smith, CF
    Groves, JG
    Paulsen, RJ
    He, L
    Harre, B
    [J]. OCEANS 2002 MTS/IEEE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION, VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 2098 - 2104
  • [7] A review of methods for measuring groundwater-surface water exchange in braided rivers
    Coluccio, Katie
    Morgan, Leanne Kaye
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (10) : 4397 - 4417
  • [8] Temporal responses of groundwater-surface water exchange to successive storm events
    Dudley-Southern, Marina
    Binley, Andrew
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (02) : 1112 - 1126
  • [9] Delineating groundwater-surface water interaction in a lake watershed (Sapanca Lake, NW Turkey)
    Atas, Ozge Can
    Yolcubal, Irfan
    Gunes, Kemal
    [J]. HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 32 (06) : 1623 - 1640
  • [10] Groundwater-surface water interaction in Denmark
    Duque, Carlos
    Nilsson, Bertel
    Engesgaard, Peter
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2023, 10 (05):