Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:44
|
作者
Nazarian, Scarlet [1 ]
Glover, Ben [1 ]
Ashrafian, Hutan [1 ]
Darzi, Ara [1 ]
Teare, Julian [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; computer-aided diagnosis; machine learning; polyp; WHITE-LIGHT COLONOSCOPY; ADENOMA DETECTION; MISS RATE; ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY; CLASSIFICATION; QUALITY; LESIONS; HISTOLOGY; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.2196/27370
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) by allowing detection and resection of neoplastic polyps. Evidence shows that many small polyps are missed on a single colonoscopy. There has been a successful adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to tackle the issues around missed polyps and as tools to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Objective: The aim of this review was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based technologies in assessing colorectal polyps. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the databases of Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Studies reporting the use of computer-aided diagnosis for polyp detection or characterization during colonoscopy were included. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated and pooled through DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling. Results: A total of 48 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in pooled polyp detection rate in patients with the use of AI for polyp detection during colonoscopy compared with patients who had standard colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.56-1.96; P<.001). When comparing patients undergoing colonoscopy with the use of AI to those without, there was also a significant increase in ADR (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.77; P<.001). Conclusions: With the aid of machine learning, there is potential to improve ADR and, consequently, reduce the incidence of CRC. The current generation of AI-based systems demonstrate impressive accuracy for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps. However, this is an evolving field and before its adoption into a clinical setting, AI systems must prove worthy to patients and clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-aided caries detection on bitewing radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ammar, Nour
    Kuehnisch, Jan
    JAPANESE DENTAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2024, 60 : 128 - 136
  • [32] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musleh, Ayman Mohammed
    AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
    Abid, Mohammad Naim
    Salem, Yahia
    Hamila, Haitham Mounir
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 69 (03) : 411 - 417
  • [33] Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Mcgenity, Clare
    Clarke, Emily L.
    Jennings, Charlotte
    Matthews, Gillian
    Cartlidge, Caroline
    Freduah-Agyemang, Henschel
    Stocken, Deborah D.
    Treanor, Darren
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [34] The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yi
    Jin, Gang
    Pang, Yao
    Wang, Wenhao
    Zhang, Hongyi
    Tuo, Guangxin
    Wu, Peng
    Wang, Zequan
    Zhu, Zijiang
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (07)
  • [35] Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meredith Noble
    Wendy Bruening
    Stacey Uhl
    Karen Schoelles
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 279 : 881 - 890
  • [36] Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Smith, Samuel C. L.
    Siau, Keith
    Cannatelli, Rosanna
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Shivaji, Uday N.
    Ghosh, Subrata
    Saltzman, John R.
    Hassan, Cesare
    Iacucci, Marietta
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (05) : E716 - E726
  • [37] Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Noble, Meredith
    Bruening, Wendy
    Uhl, Stacey
    Schoelles, Karen
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 279 (06) : 881 - 890
  • [38] Diagnostic accuracy of different computer-aided diagnostic systems for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging A systematic review with diagnostic meta-analysis
    Xing, Xiping
    Zhao, Xinke
    Wei, Huiping
    Li, Yingdong
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (03) : E23817
  • [39] COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS IN ENDOSCOPIC DETECTION OF EARLY NEOPLASIA IN BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kumar, Anand
    Trindade, Arvind J.
    Robbins, David H.
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Swaminath, Arun
    McCabe, Evin J.
    Benias, Petros C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB378 - AB379
  • [40] Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Polyps and Colorectal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chaparro, Maria
    Gisbert, Javier P.
    del Campo, Lourdes
    Cantero, Jose
    Mate, Jose
    DIGESTION, 2009, 80 (01) : 1 - 17