Disaggregating ecosystem services and disservices in the cultural landscapes of southwestern Ethiopia: a study of rural perceptions

被引:46
|
作者
Dorresteijn, Ine [1 ]
Schultner, Jannik [1 ]
Collier, Neil French [1 ]
Hylander, Kristoffer [2 ]
Senbeta, Feyera [3 ]
Fischer, Joern [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Lueneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Scharnhorststr 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Ecol Environm & Plant Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Addis Ababa Univ, Coll Dev Studies, Ctr Environm & Dev, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Agriculture-forest mosaic; Benefit distribution; Ecosystem service-disservice framework; Human-wildlife conflict; Poverty; PARTICIPATORY FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND-USE; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; COFFEE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; IMPACTS; LIVELIHOODS; STRATEGIES; CONFLICT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-017-0552-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Cultural landscapes provide essential ecosystem services to local communities, especially in poor rural settings. However, potentially negative impacts of ecosystems-or disservices-remain inadequately understood. Similarly, how benefit-cost outcomes differ within communities is unclear, but potentially important for cultural landscape management. Here we investigated whether distinct forest ecosystem service-disservice outcomes emerge within local communities. We aimed to characterize groups of community members according to service-disservice outcomes, and assessed their attitudes towards the forest. We interviewed 150 rural households in southwestern Ethiopia about locally relevant ecosystem services (provisioning services) and disservices (wildlife impacts). Households were grouped based on their ecosystem service-disservice profiles through hierarchical clustering. We used linear models to assess differences between groups in geographic and socioeconomic characteristics, as well as attitudes toward the forest. We identified three groups with distinct ecosystem service-disservice profiles. Half of the households fell into a "lose-lose" profile (low benefits, high costs), while fewer had "lose-escape" (low benefits, low costs) and "win-lose" (high benefits, high costs) profiles. Location relative to forest and altitude explained differences between the "lose-escape" profile and other households. Socioeconomic factors were also important. "Win-lose" households appeared to be wealthier and had better forest use rights compared to "lose-lose" households. Attitudes towards the forest did not differ between profiles. Our study demonstrates the importance of disaggregating both ecosystem services and disservices, instead of assuming that communities receive benefits and costs homogenously. To manage cultural landscapes sustainably, such heterogeneity must be acknowledged and better understood.
引用
收藏
页码:2151 / 2165
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Social Valuation of Mediterranean Cultural Landscapes: Exploring Landscape Preferences and Ecosystem Services Perceptions through a Visual Approach
    Bidegain, Inigo
    Lopez-Santiago, Cesar A.
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    Martinez-Sastre, Rodrigo
    Ravera, Federica
    Cerda, Claudia
    [J]. LAND, 2020, 9 (10) : 1 - 22
  • [32] Influence of human interventions on local perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provided by coastal landscapes: Case study of the Huiwen wetland, southern China
    Dou, Yuehan
    Liu, Mengxiao
    Bakker, Martha
    Yu, Xiubo
    Carsjens, Gerrit J.
    De Groot, Rudolf
    Liu, Junguo
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 50
  • [33] Use of structural equation modeling to explore influences on perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices attributed to birds in Singapore
    Leong, Rachel A. T.
    Fung, Tze Kwan
    Sachidhanandam, Uma
    Drillet, Zuzana
    Edwards, Peter J.
    Richards, Daniel R.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 46
  • [34] The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context
    Csurgo, Bernadett
    Smith, Melanie K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 86 : 76 - 86
  • [35] Iconic manakins and despicable grackles: Comparing cultural ecosystem services and disservices across stakeholders in Costa Rica
    Echeverri, Alejandra
    Naidoo, Robin
    Karp, Daniel S.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Zhao, Jiaying
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 106
  • [36] Valuing forest ecosystem services and disservices - Case study of aprotected area in India
    Ninan, K. N.
    Kontoleon, Andreas
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 20 : 1 - 14
  • [37] Spatiotemporal valuation of cultural and natural landscapes contributing to Pakistan's cultural ecosystem services
    Shedayi, Arshad Ali
    Xu, Ming
    Gonalez-Redin, Julen
    Ali, Amjad
    Shahzad, Laila
    Rahim, Sabit
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (27) : 41834 - 41848
  • [38] Spatiotemporal valuation of cultural and natural landscapes contributing to Pakistan’s cultural ecosystem services
    Arshad Ali Shedayi
    Ming Xu
    Julen Gonalez-Redin
    Amjad Ali
    Laila Shahzad
    Sabit Rahim
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 41834 - 41848
  • [39] Assessing vegetation cover and valuing ecosystem services in southwestern Ethiopia: Implications for conservation
    Yilma, Zenebe Ageru
    Yitay, Bialfew Ashagrie
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [40] Ecosystem services of tree windbreaks in rural landscapes-a systematic review
    Weninger, T.
    Scheper, S.
    Lackoova, L.
    Kitzler, B.
    Gartner, K.
    King, N. W.
    Cornelis, W.
    Strauss, P.
    Michel, K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (10):