PRACTICES OF INTERACTION OF STATE AND NON-STATE ACTORS IN THE CONTEXT OF REGULATION OF THE MASS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

被引:1
|
作者
Morozov, Sergei, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Volgograd State Univ, Dept Int Relat Polit Sci & Area Studies, Prosp Univ Sky 100, Volgograd 400062, Russia
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
information; communication; institutional interaction; state; public management; political technologies; system of mass communication;
D O I
10.15688/jvolsu4.2020.1.20
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
Introduction. The article represents the author's interpretation of the actor composition of implementing information policy in modern Russia. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the main conditions of interaction between state and non-state structures of the Russian Federation in the process of determining priorities and strategies for ensuring information security in Russia. The problem of this research is actualized by increasing dependence of the mass communication domestic system on modern global geopolitical threats and foreign policy challenges. Russia and Russian society need a set of effective tools and methods to ensure the security and stability of the mass communication system. Methodology and methods. The main methodology of this study is the principles of the communicative approach (N. Wiener, C. Deutsch). Besides, the ideas about the technological core of political communication find their scientific and practical application (S.V. Volodenkov, M. Castells, S.V. Schwarzenberg). The analysis of the combination of public political communication and the processes of administrative-state management is based on the conclusions, which are contained in the articles of G. Lassuela and O.F. Shabrov. The empirical basis of the research is the public opinion polls of "Levada Center". Analysis. The modern world is increasingly differentiated by the degree of information richness: the more the country is informationally open, the faster the production of new ideas, their inclusion in political decisions. The modern process of political communication has shifted to greater interactivity. Information policy, political regulation of the mass communication system becomes the leading sphere of management activities of state and non-state structures. Discussion. The indicative model development of political-communicative interaction of information policy actors in the Russian Federation is hampered by a number of problems. Some of them are associated with established practices of political administration by state institutions of information processes. Other problems come from the unwillingness of civil structures to carry out the functions of public political management in the field of information security. The result is a decline in public confidence in political information and the Russian media. Results. The author proposes the main forms of coordinated interaction of state and non-state actors in the field of information regulation, ensuring the information security of the Russian Federation. The researcher substantiates the idea of the relationship of the mass communication system development with the formation of information and communication competencies of the Russian Federation population.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 253
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NETWORK STRUCTURES AS A MODEL OF INTERACTION BETWEEN STATE AND NON-STATE ACTORS IN EU FOREIGN POLICY
    Leonidovich, Sinegubov Alexey
    Alexeevich, Safranchuk Ivan
    [J]. VOLGOGRADSKII GOSUDARSTVENNYI UNIVERSITET-VESTNIK-SERIYA 4-ISTORIYA REGIONOVEDENIE MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2013, 18 (02): : 117 - 124
  • [22] Non-State Actors and the Ethics of International Relations
    Jolic, Tvrtko
    [J]. DRUSTVENA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2019, 28 (04): : 711 - 729
  • [23] Rethinking non-state armed actors and sovereignty
    Yesiltas, Murat
    Kardas, Tuncay
    Jacoby, Tim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2022,
  • [24] Non-state actors in education in the Global South
    Srivastava, Prachi
    Walford, Geoffrey
    [J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2016, 42 (05) : 491 - 494
  • [25] Rethinking non-state armed actors and sovereignty
    Yesiltas, Murat
    Kardas, Tuncay
    Jacoby, Tim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2023, 60 (01) : 128 - 133
  • [26] Scientists as non-state actors of public diplomacy
    Carosso, Giovanni A.
    Ferreira, Leonardo M. R.
    Mostajo-Radji, Mohammed A.
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (11) : 1129 - 1130
  • [27] Human rights obligations of non-state actors
    Kruma, Kristine
    [J]. EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (03) : 383 - 387
  • [28] Torture by Non-state Actors Four Inquiries
    Le Moli, Ginevra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2021, 19 (02) : 363 - 391
  • [29] Non-state actors in world politics.
    Kümmel, G
    [J]. POLITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT, 2003, 44 (01) : 131 - 132
  • [30] Participation of Non-State Actors in ICJ Proceedings
    Ronen, Yael
    [J]. LAW & PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, 2012, 11 (01): : 77 - 110