Homogeneity in the association of body mass index with type 2 diabetes across the UK Biobank: A Mendelian randomization study

被引:0
|
作者
Wainberg, Michael [1 ]
Mahajan, Anubha [2 ,3 ]
Kundaje, Anshul [1 ]
McCarthy, Mark I. [2 ,3 ,5 ,11 ]
Ingelsson, Erik [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Sinnott-Armstrong, Nasa [4 ]
Rivas, Manuel A. [10 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Wellcome Ctr Human Genet, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Ctr Diabet Endocrinol & Metab, Churchill Hosp, Oxford, England
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Genet, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Churchill Hosp, NIHR Oxford Biomed Res Ctr, Oxford, England
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Mol Epidemiol, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Uppsala Univ, Sci Life Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[8] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Stanford Cardiovasc Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[10] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[11] Genentech Inc, OMNI Human Genet, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
LIFE-STYLE; WEIGHT-LOSS; RISK; OBESITY; BIAS; INTERVENTION; OVERWEIGHT; RATIO;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.1002982; 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002982.r001; 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002982.r002; 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002982.r003; 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002982.r004; 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002982.r005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lifestyle interventions to reduce body mass index (BMI) are critical public health strategies for type 2 diabetes prevention. While weight loss interventions have shown demonstrable benefit for high-risk and prediabetic individuals, we aimed to determine whether the same benefits apply to those at lower risk. Methods and findings We performed a multi-stratum Mendelian randomization study of the effect size of BMI on diabetes odds in 287,394 unrelated individuals of self-reported white British ancestry in the UK Biobank, who were recruited from across the United Kingdom from 2006 to 2010 when they were between the ages of 40 and 69 years. Individuals were stratified on the following diabetes risk factors: BMI, diabetes family history, and genome-wide diabetes polygenic risk score. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio of diabetes per 1-kg/m(2) BMI reduction, in the full cohort and in each stratum. Diabetes prevalence increased sharply with BMI, family history of diabetes, and genetic risk. Conversely, predicted risk reduction from weight loss was strikingly similar across BMI and genetic risk categories. Weight loss was predicted to substantially reduce diabetes odds even among lower-risk individuals: for instance, a 1-kg/m(2) BMI reduction was associated with a 1.37-fold reduction (95% CI 1.12-1.68) in diabetes odds among non-overweight individuals (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)) without a family history of diabetes, similar to that in obese individuals (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) with a family history (1.21-fold reduction, 95% CI 1.13-1.29). A key limitation of this analysis is that the BMI-altering DNA sequence polymorphisms it studies represent cumulative predisposition over an individual's entire lifetime, and may consequently incorrectly estimate the risk modification potential of weight loss interventions later in life. Conclusions In a population-scale cohort, lower BMI was consistently associated with reduced diabetes risk across BMI, family history, and genetic risk categories, suggesting all individuals can substantially reduce their diabetes risk through weight loss. Our results support the broad deployment of weight loss interventions to individuals at all levels of diabetes risk. Author summaryWhy was this study done? Excessive body weight is a key risk factor for type 2 diabetes, and weight loss is known to dramatically reduce risk, at least among people who were at high risk to begin with. However, even people without obvious risk factors like excessive weight or a family history of the disease still have a relatively large chance (about 1 percent) of developing type 2 diabetes: Could these individuals also reduce their risk of type 2 diabetes through weight loss? What did the researchers do and find? We looked at inherited genetic mutations that predispose people to lower body weight, and asked how much these mutations tend to protect people from type 2 diabetes, across 287,394 self-reported white British individuals from the UK Biobank cohort. We found that these mutations seem to offer about the same degree of protection against type 2 diabetes regardless of a person's body weight, family history of type 2 diabetes, or genetic risk for type 2 diabetes, suggesting that weight loss would have a similarly uniform protective effect for all individuals. What do these findings mean? These findings suggest that all individuals can substantially reduce their type 2 diabetes risk through weight loss, and support the broad deployment of weight loss interventions to individuals at all levels of diabetes risk as a public health measure. However, a key limitation to keep in mind is that genetic mutations, because they act across an individual's entire lifespan, are not a perfect proxy for weight loss interventions that happen only later in life.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Understanding Factors That Cause Tinnitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study in the UK Biobank
    Cresswell, Manuela
    Casanova, Francesco
    Beaumont, Robin N.
    Wood, Andrew R.
    Ronan, Natalie
    Hilton, Malcolm P.
    Tyrrell, Jess
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (01): : 70 - 80
  • [42] Educational attainment and drinking behaviors: Mendelian randomization study in UK Biobank
    Zhou, Tao
    Sun, Dianjianyi
    Li, Xiang
    Ma, Hao
    Heianza, Yoriko
    Qi, Lu
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 26 (08) : 4355 - 4366
  • [43] Glucose, Insulin, and Brain Health in the UK Biobank: A Mendelian Randomization Study
    Garfield, Victoria
    Rentsch, Christopher T.
    Smeeth, Liam
    Bhaskaran, Krishnan
    Chaturvedi, Nishi
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 46 (07) : 494 - 495
  • [44] Alcohol use and cardiometabolic risk in the UK Biobank: A Mendelian randomization study
    Lankester, Joanna
    Zanetti, Daniela
    Ingelsson, Erik
    Assimes, Themistocles L.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [45] Association of educational attainment with hypertension and type-2 diabetes: A Mendelian randomization study
    Zhang, Xin
    Yu, Shi-liang
    Qi, Lu-ming
    Xia, Li -na
    Yang, Qing-tang
    SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2024, 25
  • [46] Mendelian Randomization and Type 2 Diabetes
    Daniel I. Swerdlow
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2016, 30 : 51 - 57
  • [47] Association of coffee consumption with type 2 diabetes and glycemic traits: a Mendelian randomization study
    Cho, Hyun Jeong
    Okekunle, Akinkunmi Paul
    Yie, Ga-Eun
    Youn, Jiyoung
    Kang, Moonil
    Jin, Taiyue
    Sung, Joohon
    Lee, Jung Eun
    NUTRITION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 17 (04) : 789 - 802
  • [48] Application of Mendelian Randomization to Investigate the Association of Body Mass Index with Health Care Costs
    Kurz, Christoph F.
    Laxy, Michael
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (02) : 156 - 169
  • [49] A mendelian randomization study on the association between type 2 diabetes and the risk of bladder cancer
    He, Yuan
    Chen, Yu
    Gao, Chang
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [50] Association of Birth Weight With Type 2 Diabetes and Glycemic Traits A Mendelian Randomization Study
    Huang, Tao
    Wang, Tiange
    Zheng, Yan
    Ellervik, Christina
    Li, Xiang
    Gao, Meng
    Fang, Zhe
    Chai, Jin-Fang
    Ahluwalia, Tarun Veer S.
    Wang, Yujie
    Voortman, Trudy
    Noordam, Raymond
    Frazier-Wood, Alexis
    Scholz, Markus
    Sonestedt, Emily
    Akiyama, Masato
    Dorajoo, Rajkumar
    Zhou, Ang
    Kilpelainen, Tuomas O.
    Kleber, Marcus E.
    Crozier, Sarah R.
    Godfrey, Keith M.
    Lemaitre, Rozenn
    Felix, Janine F.
    Shi, Yuan
    Gupta, Preeti
    Khor, Chiea-Chuen
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Wang, Carol A.
    Tiesler, Carla M. T.
    Thiering, Elisabeth
    Standl, Marie
    Rzehak, Peter
    Marouli, Eirini
    He, Meian
    Lecoeur, Cecile
    Corella, Dolores
    Lai, Chao-Qiang
    Moreno, Luis A.
    Pitkanen, Niina
    Boreham, Colin A.
    Zhang, Tao
    Saw, Seang Mei
    Ridker, Paul M.
    Graff, Mariaelisa
    Van Rooij, Frank J. A.
    Uitterlinden, Andre G.
    Hofman, Albert
    van Heemst, Diana
    Rosendaal, Frits R.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (09) : E1910915