Critical appraisal of patient-specific implants for secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstruction

被引:2
|
作者
Schreurs, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Klop, C. [1 ,2 ]
Gooris, P. J. J. [1 ,2 ]
Maal, T. J. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Becking, A. G. [1 ,2 ]
Dubois, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Radboudumc 3DLab, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Orbital Fractures; Surgery; Computer-assisted; Reoperation; Patient-Specific; Modeling; Treatment outcome; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SURGERY; DEFORMITIES; NAVIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.08.027
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In orbital reconstruction, a patient-specific implant (PSI) may provide accurate reconstruction in complex cases, since the design can be tailored to the anatomy. Several design options may be embedded, for ease of positioning and precision of reconstruction. This study describes a cohort of 22 patients treated for secondary orbital reconstruction with a PSI; one patient received two PSI. The preoperative clinical characteristics and implant design options used are presented. When compared to preoperative characteristics, the postoperative clinical outcomes showed significant improvements in terms of enophthalmos (P < 0.001), diplopia (P < 0.001), and hypoglobus (P = 0.002). The implant position in all previous reconstructions was considered inadequate. Quantitative analysis after PSI reconstruction showed accurate positioning of the implant, with small median and 90th percentile deviations (roll: median 1.3 degrees, 90th percentile 4.6 degrees; pitch: median 1.4 degrees, 90th percentile 3.9 degrees; yaw: median 1.0 degrees, 90th percentile 4.4 degrees; translation: median 1.4 mm, 90th percentile 2.7 mm). Rim support proved to be a significant predictor of roll and rim extension for yaw. No significant relationship between design options or PSI position and clinical outcomes could be established. The results of this study show the benefits of PSI for the clinical outcomes in a large cohort of secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 798
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-specific implants in orbital reconstruction
    Hajibandeh, Jeffrey
    Lee, Cameron
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 30 (04): : 230 - 235
  • [2] The Use of Patient-Specific Orbital Reconstruction Implants During Maxillectomy Reconstruction
    Desai, Dipan P. D.
    Alwani, Mohamedkazim
    Sheen, Derek
    Narayanan, Ajay
    Gordin, Eli
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (05) : 403 - 408
  • [3] Surgical Outcomes of Orbital Fracture Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Implants
    Blumer, Michael
    Essig, Harald
    Steigmiller, Klaus
    Wagner, Maximilian Eberhard
    Gander, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 79 (06) : 1302 - 1312
  • [4] Patient-Specific Orbital Implants Vs. Pre-Formed Implants for Internal Orbital Reconstruction
    Prat, Daphna Landau
    Massarwa, Said
    Zohar, Assa
    Priel, Ayelet
    Sagiv, Oded
    Zloto, Ofira
    Ben Simon, Guy J. J.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 38 (04) : 365 - 370
  • [5] Patient-Specific Orbital Implants: Development and Implementation of Technology for More Accurate Orbital Reconstruction
    Podolsky, Dale J.
    Mainprize, James G.
    Edwards, Glenn P.
    Antonyshyn, Oleh M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 27 (01) : 131 - 133
  • [6] Current Strategies in Post-traumatic Orbital Reconstruction
    Nils-Claudius Gellrich
    Jan Dittmann
    Simon Spalthoff
    Philipp Jehn
    Frank Tavassol
    Rüdiger Zimmerer
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2019, 18 : 483 - 489
  • [7] Current Strategies in Post-traumatic Orbital Reconstruction
    Gellrich, Nils-Claudius
    Dittmann, Jan
    Spalthoff, Simon
    Jehn, Philipp
    Tavassol, Frank
    Zimmerer, Ruediger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2019, 18 (04): : 483 - 489
  • [8] Do Patient-Specific Implants Decrease Complications and Increase Orbital Volume Reconstruction Accuracy in Primary Orbital Fracture Reconstruction?
    Timoshchuk, Mari-Alina
    Murnan, Eric J.
    Chapple, Andrew G.
    Christensen, Brian J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 80 (04) : 669 - 675
  • [9] Patient-specific Implants for Orbital Fractures: A Systematic Review
    Maher, Dominic, I
    Hall, Anthony J.
    Gwini, StellaMay
    Ben Artsi, Elad
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 38 (05): : 417 - 424
  • [10] Personalized Medicine Workflow in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction
    Sabelis, Juliana F.
    Schreurs, Ruud
    Essig, Harald
    Becking, Alfred G.
    Dubois, Leander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (09):