A tale of two cities: the cost, price-differential and affordability of current and healthy diets in Sydney and Canberra, Australia

被引:25
|
作者
Lee, Amanda J. [1 ]
Kane, Sarah [2 ]
Herron, Lisa-Maree [1 ]
Matsuyama, Misa [1 ]
Lewis, Meron [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, 288 Herston Rd, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Diet price; Food price; Food affordability; INFORMAS; Nutrition policy; Fiscal policy; FOOD PRICE; QUALITY; AVAILABILITY; CONVENIENCE; VEGETABLES; CHEAPER; IMPACT; FRUITS; POOR; TAX;
D O I
10.1186/s12966-020-00981-0
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background The perception that healthy foods are more expensive than unhealthy foods has been reported widely to be a key barrier to healthy eating. However, assessment of the relative cost of healthy and unhealthy foods and diets is fraught methodologically. Standardised approaches to produce reliable data on the cost of total diets and different dietary patterns, rather than selected foods, are lacking globally to inform policy and practice. Methods This paper reports the first application, in randomly selected statistical areas stratified by socio-economic status in two Australian cities, of the Healthy Diets Australian Standardized Affordability and Pricing (ASAP) method protocols: diet pricing tools based on national nutrition survey data and dietary guidelines; store sampling and location; determination of household incomes; food price data collection; and analysis and reporting. The methods were developed by the International Network on Food and Obesity/NCD Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) as a prototype of an optimum approach to assess, compare and monitor the cost and affordability of diets across different geographical and socio-economic settings and times. Results Under current tax policy in Australia, healthy diets would be 15-17% less expensive than current (unhealthy) diets in all locations assessed. Nevertheless, healthy diets are likely to be unaffordable for low income households, costing more than 30% of disposable income in both cities surveyed. Households spent around 58% of their food budget on unhealthy food and drinks. Food costs were on average 4% higher in Canberra than Sydney, and tended to be higher in high socioeconomic locations. Conclusions Health and fiscal policy actions to increase affordability of healthy diets for low income households are required urgently. Also, there is a need to counter perceptions that current, unhealthy diets must be less expensive than healthy diets. The Healthy Diets ASAP methods could be adapted to assess the cost and affordability of healthy and unhealthy diets elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [11] Modelling the cost differential between healthy and current diets: the New Zealand case study
    Stefanie Vandevijvere
    Nick Young
    Sally Mackay
    Boyd Swinburn
    Mark Gahegan
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15
  • [12] Modelling the cost differential between current and healthy diets according to household education level in Belgium
    Pedroni, Camille
    Castetbon, Katia
    Desbouys, Lucille
    Vandevijvere, Stefanie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES AND NUTRITION, 2024, 75 (08) : 882 - 897
  • [13] Testing the Price of Healthy and Current Diets in Remote Aboriginal Communities to Improve Food Security: Development of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healthy Diets ASAP (Australian Standardised Affordability and Pricing) Methods
    Lee, Amanda
    Lewis, Meron
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (12)
  • [14] Costing recommended (healthy) and current (unhealthy) diets in urban and inner regional areas of Australia using remote price collection methods
    Zorbas, Christina
    Brooks, Ruby
    Bennett, Rebecca
    Lee, Amanda
    Marshall, Josephine
    Naughton, Shaan
    Lewis, Meron
    Peeters, Anna
    Backholer, Kathryn
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2022, 25 (03) : 528 - 537