Effects of pungency degree on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste

被引：21

作者：

Li, Yangyang ^{[1
,2
]}

Jin, Yiying ^{[1
,2
]}

Li, Jinhui ^{[1
,2
]}

Li, Hailong ^{[3
]}

Yu, Zhixin ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China

[2] Tsinghua Univ, Minist Educ China, Key Lab Solid Waste Management & Environm Safety, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China

[3] Malardalen Univ, Sch Sustainable Dev Soc & Technol, SE-72123 Vasteras, Sweden

[4] Univ Stavanger, Dept Petr Engn, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway

来源：

APPLIED ENERGY | 2016年 / 181卷

关键词：

Kitchen waste; Anaerobic digestion; Pungency degree; Degradation kinetics; FOOD WASTE; RETENTION TIME; CO-DIGESTION; RED-PEPPER; CAPSAICIN; PRETREATMENT; AMMONIA; HYDROLYSIS; ENERGY; TEMPERATURE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.057

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

This study investigated the influence of pungency degrees (PDs) on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste (KW). Batch tests were performed to evaluate the methane potential and production rate and the effect of PDs on organics degradation efficiency (in terms of volatile solids, protein and ether extract) at mesophilic temperature. Koch and Drewes model and modified Gompertz model were applied to assess the effects of PDs on the hydrolysis rate constant, biomethane yield rate and lag time. The results revealed that with the increasing contributions of PDs, the methane yield, organics degradation efficiency and hydrolysis rate of KW decreased while the pH values and concentrations of total ammonia nitrogen and free ammonia nitrogen were increased. Additionally, PDs lower than PD3 presented better digestion performance, and according to results of organics degradation and kinetics study, it could be suggested that appropriate range of PD in KW beneficial for AD is PD5-PD4. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：171 / 178

页数：8

共 50 条

[31] Mesophilic anaerobic digestion: first option for waste treatment in tropical regions
Suryawanshi, P. C.
Chaudhari, A. B.
Kothari, R. M.
[J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 30 (04) : 259 - 282
[32] Mesophilic, Thermophilic And Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion Of Waste Activated Sludge
Bolzonella, David
Fatone, Francesco
Di Fabio, Silvia
Cecchi, Franco
[J]. ICHEAP-9: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2009, 17 : 385 - +
[33] The mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of coffee waste containing coffee grounds
Dinsdale, RM
Hawkes, FR
Hawkes, DL
[J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1996, 30 (02) : 371 - 377
[34] Mineral Requirements for Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Solid Waste
Uemura, Sh.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (01) : 33 - 40
[35] Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Italian case studies
Bolzonella, D
Pavan, P
Battistoni, P
Cecchi, F
[J]. WASTEWATER SLUDGE AS A RESOURCE, 2003, : 439 - 446
[36] Effects of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures on the anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste
Wu, Zi-Fan
Wang, Zhao-Kai
Li, Jia-Bing
Qiu, Yu-Hong
Chen, Zu-Liang
Owens, Gary
Yang, Zhi-Man
[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 230
[37] Evolution of Multiple Kitchen Waste Components and Each Components Anaerobic Digestion
Feng, Lei
You, Xueyi
Li, Rundong
Zhang, Xudong
[J]. JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 571 - 577
[38] Mesophilic co-digestion kitchen rubbish
Fu, Sheng-Tao
Yu, Shui-Li
Fu-Ying
Liu, Ru-Peng
Zhang, Lan-He
Yan, Xiao-Ju
[J]. Proceedings of 2006 Beijing International Environmental Technology Conference, 2006, : 84 - 92
[39] Treatment of kitchen waste using a mobile thermophilic anaerobic digestion system
Kuo, Wen-Chien
Lai, Wen-Lung
[J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) : 2335 - 2339
[40] Dynamic Soft Sensor for Anaerobic Digestion of Kitchen Waste Based on SGSTGAT
Wang, Yuhong
Yan, Pengfei
Gai, Minghui
[J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (17) : 19198 - 19208

← 1 2 3 4 5 →