Challenging a dogma; AJCC 8th staging system is not sufficient to predict outcomes of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

被引:14
|
作者
Abdel-Rahman, Omar [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Clin Oncol Dept, Lotfy Elsayed St, Cairo 11566, Egypt
关键词
Mesothelioma; MPM; Prognosis; AJCC; SEER; TNM CLASSIFICATION; IASLC MESOTHELIOMA; PROJECT PROPOSALS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DESCRIPTORS; EDITION; REVISIONS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The 8th edition of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has been published. The current analysis aims to evaluate its performance in a population-based setting among patients recorded within the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. Methods: SEER database (2004-2013) has been accessed through SEER*Stat program and AJCC 8th edition stage groups were reconstructed. Survival analyses (overall and cancer-specific) were conducted according to 6th and 8th editions through Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox-regression multivariate model was also utilized for pair wise comparisons between different prognostic groups for overall and cancer-specific survival. Results: A total of 5382 patients with MPM were identified in the period from 2004 to 2013. According to the 6th edition, significant pair wise P values for overall survival included: IA vs. III (P = 0.027); IA vs. IV: P < 0.0001; IB vs. IV: P < 0.0001; II vs. III: P< 0.0001; II vs. IV: P < 0.0001; III vs. IV: P < 0.0001). According to the 8th edition, significant pair wise P values for overall survival included: all stages vs. IV: P < 0.0001; IA vs. II: P = 0.046; IA vs. IIIA: P = 0.022; IA vs. IIIB: P< 0.0001; IB vs. II: P < 0.0001; IB vs. IIIB: P < 0.0001; II vs. IIIA: P < 0.0001; IIIA vs. IIIB: P < 0.0001). C-index for 6th edition was 0.539 (SE: 0.008; 95% CI: 0.524-0.555); while C-index for 8th edition was 0.540 (SE: 0.008; 95% CI: 0.525-0.556). Based on the above findings, a simplified staging system was proposed and overall and cancer-specific survivals were evaluated according to the simplified system. For overall and cancer-specific survival assessment, P values for all pair wise comparisons among different stages were significant (< 0.01). Conclusion: The prognostic performance of both the 6th and 8th AJCC editions is unsatisfactory; there is a need for a more practical and prognostically relevant staging system for MPM.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 133
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modified the 8th AJCC staging system for patients with advanced prostate cancer: a study based on SEER database
    Chengwen Sun
    Dongrong Yang
    Jin Zhu
    Yibin Zhou
    Congming Xiang
    Sheng Wu
    BMC Urology, 22
  • [22] A Modified Histopathological Staging System of Penile Cancer: Comparison with 8th AJCC Staging System and Correlation with Outcome Variables
    Shah, Ashish
    Menon, Santosh
    Sali, Akash
    Bakshi, Ganesh
    Prakash, Gagan
    Pal, Mahendra
    Murthy, Vedang
    Joshi, Amit
    Desai, Sangeeta
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2022, 102 (SUPPL 1) : 670 - 671
  • [23] Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer
    O. Abdel-Rahman
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2018, 20 : 550 - 556
  • [24] Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer
    Abdel-Rahman, O.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 (04): : 550 - 556
  • [25] The Prognostic Value of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Kantor, Olga
    Bao, Jean
    Jaskowiak, Nora
    Yao, Katherine
    Tseng, Jennifer
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 352 - 358
  • [26] Modified the 8th AJCC staging system for patients with advanced prostate cancer: a study based on SEER database
    Sun, Chengwen
    Yang, Dongrong
    Zhu, Jin
    Zhou, Yibin
    Xiang, Congming
    Wu, Sheng
    BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [27] Comparison of a Tumor-Ratio-Metastasis Staging System and the 8th AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer
    Zhang, Miaoquan
    Ding, Chao
    Xu, Lin
    Ou, Biyi
    Feng, Shoucheng
    Wang, Guoqiang
    Wang, Wei
    Liang, Yao
    Chen, Yingbo
    Zhou, Zhiwei
    Qiu, Haibo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [28] The Prognostic Value of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Olga Kantor
    Jean Bao
    Nora Jaskowiak
    Katherine Yao
    Jennifer Tseng
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 352 - 358
  • [29] A review of the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system for oropharyngeal cancer according to HPV status
    Piotr Machczyński
    Ewa Majchrzak
    Patryk Niewinski
    Joanna Marchlewska
    Wojciech Golusiński
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2020, 277 : 2407 - 2412
  • [30] A review of the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system for oropharyngeal cancer according to HPV status
    Machczynski, Piotr
    Majchrzak, Ewa
    Niewinski, Patryk
    Marchlewska, Joanna
    Golusinski, Wojciech
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 277 (09) : 2407 - 2412