Challenging a dogma; AJCC 8th staging system is not sufficient to predict outcomes of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

被引:14
|
作者
Abdel-Rahman, Omar [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Clin Oncol Dept, Lotfy Elsayed St, Cairo 11566, Egypt
关键词
Mesothelioma; MPM; Prognosis; AJCC; SEER; TNM CLASSIFICATION; IASLC MESOTHELIOMA; PROJECT PROPOSALS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DESCRIPTORS; EDITION; REVISIONS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The 8th edition of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has been published. The current analysis aims to evaluate its performance in a population-based setting among patients recorded within the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. Methods: SEER database (2004-2013) has been accessed through SEER*Stat program and AJCC 8th edition stage groups were reconstructed. Survival analyses (overall and cancer-specific) were conducted according to 6th and 8th editions through Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox-regression multivariate model was also utilized for pair wise comparisons between different prognostic groups for overall and cancer-specific survival. Results: A total of 5382 patients with MPM were identified in the period from 2004 to 2013. According to the 6th edition, significant pair wise P values for overall survival included: IA vs. III (P = 0.027); IA vs. IV: P < 0.0001; IB vs. IV: P < 0.0001; II vs. III: P< 0.0001; II vs. IV: P < 0.0001; III vs. IV: P < 0.0001). According to the 8th edition, significant pair wise P values for overall survival included: all stages vs. IV: P < 0.0001; IA vs. II: P = 0.046; IA vs. IIIA: P = 0.022; IA vs. IIIB: P< 0.0001; IB vs. II: P < 0.0001; IB vs. IIIB: P < 0.0001; II vs. IIIA: P < 0.0001; IIIA vs. IIIB: P < 0.0001). C-index for 6th edition was 0.539 (SE: 0.008; 95% CI: 0.524-0.555); while C-index for 8th edition was 0.540 (SE: 0.008; 95% CI: 0.525-0.556). Based on the above findings, a simplified staging system was proposed and overall and cancer-specific survivals were evaluated according to the simplified system. For overall and cancer-specific survival assessment, P values for all pair wise comparisons among different stages were significant (< 0.01). Conclusion: The prognostic performance of both the 6th and 8th AJCC editions is unsatisfactory; there is a need for a more practical and prognostically relevant staging system for MPM.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 133
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial Analyses of the IASLC Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) Database: Implications for the 8th Edition AJCC and UICC Staging Manuals
    Rusch, Valerie
    Chansky, Kari
    Nowak, Anna
    Rice, David
    Kindler, Hedy Lee
    Pass, Harvey
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S223 - S223
  • [2] Validations of the 8th edition of AJCC staging system for patients with pancreatic cancer
    Zhu, X.
    Ju, X.
    Cao, Y.
    Zhao, X.
    Shen, Y.
    Cao, F.
    Qing, S.
    Gu, L.
    Fang, F.
    Jia, Z.
    Zhang, H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 141 : S19 - S19
  • [3] Disparities in the impact of the AJCC 8th edition staging system on differentiated thyroid cancer outcomes
    Santamaria-Barria, Juan A.
    Graff-Baker, Amanda N.
    Chang, Shu-Ching
    Khader, Adam
    Scholer, Anthony J.
    Garland-Kledzik, Mary
    Goldfarb, Melanie
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (10): : 2129 - 2141
  • [4] Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?
    Omar Abdel-Rahman
    Hepatobiliary&PancreaticDiseasesInternational, 2018, 17 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [6] Modification of the 8th AJCC staging system of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Nagaria, Teddy Sutardji
    Wang, Huamin
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2020, 9 (01) : 95 - 97
  • [7] The direct comparison between 7th AJCC staging system and 8th AJCC staging system for prediction of survival with Korean multicenter HCC patients
    Lee, Y. -S.
    Kim, J. H.
    Lee, C. U.
    Suh, S. J.
    Jung, Y. K.
    Seo, Y. S.
    Yim, H. J.
    Yeon, J. E.
    Byun, K. S.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : S434 - S435
  • [8] The direct comparison between 7th AJCC staging system and 8th AJCC staging system for prediction of survival with Korean multicenter HCC patients
    Lee, Young-Sun
    Kim, Ji Hoon
    Chang, Sung Won
    Lee, Ha Seok
    Kim, Sehwa
    Bak, Haein
    Lee, Min-Jin
    Lee, Chan Uk
    Jung, Young Kul
    Seo, Yeon Seok
    Yim, Hyung Joon
    Yeon, Jong Eun
    Um, Soon Ho
    Byun, Kwan Soo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 411 - 411
  • [9] Evaluation of the 8th Edition AJCC Staging System for the Clinical Staging of Pancreatic Cancer
    Kang, Huapyong
    Kim, Seung-seob
    Sung, Min Je
    Jo, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Park, Seung Woo
    Song, Si Young
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Bang, Seungmin
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [10] The Direct Comparison between 7th AJCC Staging System and 8th AJCC Staging System for Prediction of Survival with Korean Multicenter HCC Patients
    Lee, Young-Sun
    Lee, Chan Uk
    Lee, Min-Jin
    Suh, Sang Jun
    Jung, Young Kul
    Kim, Ji Hoon
    Seo, Yeon Seok
    Yim, Hyung Joon
    Yeon, Jong Eun
    Byun, Kwan Soo
    HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : 533A - 533A