Mark-resight methodology for estimating key deer abundance assisted by citizen scientists

被引:0
|
作者
Silvy, Nova J. [1 ]
Lopez, Roel R. [2 ]
Lopez, Cristian N. [3 ]
Breen, Timothy [4 ]
Lopez, Angelica [2 ]
Montalvo, Andrea E. [2 ]
Parker, Israel D. [2 ]
Powell, Brian [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Wildlife & Fisheries Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Nat Resources Inst, 1919 Oakwell Farms Pkwy, San Antonio, TX 78218 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Rangeland Wildlife & Fisheries Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, South Florida Ecol Serv Field Off, Vero Beach, FL 32960 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2022年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
citizen scientist; distance population estimation; Florida; Key deer; livestock dye; mark-resight population estimation; POPULATION-DENSITY; FLORIDA;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1298
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Florida Key deer (Odocoileus virginianus clavium) are an endangered subspecies of white-tailed deer endemic to the Lower Florida Keys. The New World screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax) infestation in July 2016 and Hurricane Irma on 10 September 2017 both caused the Key deer population to decline. Our objective was to estimate current Key deer population abundance using traditional distance sampling and a mark-resight methodology applicable for citizen scientist participation. For mark-resight efforts, deer were marked with hand sprayers using water-based livestock dye on Big Pine (BPK) and No Name keys (NNK). Biologists conducted road surveys between 9-13 March 2020 on BPK and NNK and collected data for mark retention, mark-resight, and distance calculations concurrently. Our mark-resight estimate (n = 748) was nearly 300 deer lower than the traditional distance estimate likely because of distance sampling's sensitivity to increased deer visibility along survey routes. Compared to historic data, our mark-resight population estimate indicated increased deer abundance compared to post-Hurricane Irma estimates (n = 573), but slightly below post-screwworm outbreak estimates (n = 860). Based on mark-retention data, we recommend all resight surveys be completed within 5 days of the first mark placement for the most dependable mark detection. We recommend our mark-resight method be used in future Key deer surveys as it is simple, efficient, and can be reliably completed with the assistance of volunteers therefore allowing for more regular monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] Comparing capture-recapture, mark-resight, and spatial mark-resight models for estimating puma densities via camera traps
    Rich, Lindsey N.
    Kelly, Marcella J.
    Sollmann, Rahel
    Noss, Andrew J.
    Maffei, Leonardo
    Arispe, Rosario L.
    Paviolo, Agustin
    De Angelo, Carlos D.
    Di Blanco, Yamai E.
    Di Bitetti, Mario S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2014, 95 (02) : 382 - 391
  • [12] Mark-resight abundance estimation under incomplete identification of marked individuals
    McClintock, Brett T.
    Hill, Jason M.
    Fritz, Lowell
    Chumbley, Kathryn
    Luxa, Katie
    Diefenbach, Duane R.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (12): : 1294 - 1304
  • [13] EVALUATION OF MARK-RESIGHT MODEL ASSUMPTIONS FOR ESTIMATING MOUNTAIN SHEEP NUMBERS
    NEAL, AK
    WHITE, GC
    GILL, RB
    REED, DF
    OLTERMAN, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1993, 57 (03): : 436 - 450
  • [14] A robust design mark-resight abundance estimator allowing heterogeneity in resighting probabilities
    McClintock, Brett T.
    White, Gary C.
    Burnham, Kenneth P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2006, 11 (03) : 231 - 248
  • [15] Mark-resight estimates of seasonal variation in harbor seal abundance and site fidelity
    Cordes, Line S.
    Thompson, Paul M.
    [J]. POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2015, 57 (03) : 467 - 472
  • [16] A robust design mark-resight abundance estimator allowing heterogeneity in resighting probabilities
    Brett T. McClintock
    Gary C. White
    Kenneth P. Burnham
    [J]. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2006, 11 : 231 - 248
  • [17] Using Natural Pelt Patterns to Estimate Population Abundance with Mark-Resight Models
    Teton, Ben S.
    Lewis, Jesse S.
    Wright, Christina T.
    White, Michael
    Young, Hillary
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2020, 44 (04): : 695 - 704
  • [18] Using camera traps to estimate ungulate abundance: a comparison of mark-resight methods
    Taylor, Jace C.
    Bates, Steven B.
    Whiting, Jericho C.
    McMillan, Brock R.
    Larsen, Randy T.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 8 (01) : 32 - 44
  • [19] Estimating numbers of greater prairie-chickens using mark-resight techniques
    Clifton, Amy M.
    Krementz, David G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 70 (02): : 479 - 484
  • [20] Estimating abundance for a savanna elephant population using mark-resight methods: a case study for the Tembe Elephant Park, South Africa
    Morley, R. C.
    van Aarde, R. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2007, 271 (04) : 418 - 427