Mark-resight methodology for estimating key deer abundance assisted by citizen scientists

被引:0
|
作者
Silvy, Nova J. [1 ]
Lopez, Roel R. [2 ]
Lopez, Cristian N. [3 ]
Breen, Timothy [4 ]
Lopez, Angelica [2 ]
Montalvo, Andrea E. [2 ]
Parker, Israel D. [2 ]
Powell, Brian [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Wildlife & Fisheries Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Nat Resources Inst, 1919 Oakwell Farms Pkwy, San Antonio, TX 78218 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Rangeland Wildlife & Fisheries Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, South Florida Ecol Serv Field Off, Vero Beach, FL 32960 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2022年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
citizen scientist; distance population estimation; Florida; Key deer; livestock dye; mark-resight population estimation; POPULATION-DENSITY; FLORIDA;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1298
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Florida Key deer (Odocoileus virginianus clavium) are an endangered subspecies of white-tailed deer endemic to the Lower Florida Keys. The New World screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax) infestation in July 2016 and Hurricane Irma on 10 September 2017 both caused the Key deer population to decline. Our objective was to estimate current Key deer population abundance using traditional distance sampling and a mark-resight methodology applicable for citizen scientist participation. For mark-resight efforts, deer were marked with hand sprayers using water-based livestock dye on Big Pine (BPK) and No Name keys (NNK). Biologists conducted road surveys between 9-13 March 2020 on BPK and NNK and collected data for mark retention, mark-resight, and distance calculations concurrently. Our mark-resight estimate (n = 748) was nearly 300 deer lower than the traditional distance estimate likely because of distance sampling's sensitivity to increased deer visibility along survey routes. Compared to historic data, our mark-resight population estimate indicated increased deer abundance compared to post-Hurricane Irma estimates (n = 573), but slightly below post-screwworm outbreak estimates (n = 860). Based on mark-retention data, we recommend all resight surveys be completed within 5 days of the first mark placement for the most dependable mark detection. We recommend our mark-resight method be used in future Key deer surveys as it is simple, efficient, and can be reliably completed with the assistance of volunteers therefore allowing for more regular monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark-resight models with camera trap data
    Bengsen, Andrew J.
    Forsyth, David M.
    Ramsey, Dave S. L.
    Amos, Matt
    Brennan, Michael
    Pople, Anthony R.
    Comte, Sebastien
    Crittle, Troy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2022, 103 (03) : 711 - 722
  • [2] Mark-resight methodology for estimating population densities for prairie dogs
    Magle, Seth B.
    Mcclintock, Brett T.
    Tripp, Dan W.
    White, Gary C.
    Antolin, Michael F.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (06): : 2067 - 2073
  • [3] Evaluation of paintball, mark-resight surveys for estimating mountain goat abundance
    Pauley, George R.
    Crenshaw, John G.
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2006, 34 (05): : 1350 - 1355
  • [4] Comparing fecal DNA capture-recapture to mark-resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
    Stewart, Andi M.
    Conner, Mary M.
    McKeever, Jane S.
    Ellsworth, Alisa
    Crowhurst, Rachel S.
    Epps, Clinton W.
    Stephenson, Thomas R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 87 (02):
  • [5] From NOREMARK to MARK: software for estimating demographic parameters using mark-resight methodology
    McClintock, Brett T.
    White, Gary C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2012, 152 : S641 - S650
  • [6] Comparing fecal DNA mark-recapture to mark-resight for estimating mule deer abundance on winter range in the eastern Sierra Nevada
    Stewart, Andi M.
    Conner, Mary M.
    McKeever, Jane
    German, Dave W.
    Stephenson, Tom R.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA FISH AND WILDLIFE JOURNAL, 2022, 108 (03):
  • [7] ESTIMATING COYOTE DENSITY FROM MARK-RESIGHT SURVEYS
    HEIN, EW
    ANDELT, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1995, 59 (01): : 164 - 169
  • [8] Mark-Recapture and Mark-Resight Methods for Estimating Abundance with Remote Cameras: A Carnivore Case Study
    Alonso, Robert S.
    McClintock, Brett T.
    Lyren, Lisa M.
    Boydston, Erin E.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [9] Improved methods for estimating abundance and related demographic parameters from mark-resight data
    McClintock, Brett T.
    White, Gary C.
    Pryde, Moira A.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2019, 75 (03) : 799 - 809
  • [10] Estimating Abundance Using Mark-Resight When Sampling Is with Replacement or the Number of Marked Individuals Is Unknown
    McClintock, Brett T.
    White, Gary C.
    Antolin, Michael F.
    Tripp, Daniel W.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2009, 65 (01) : 237 - 246