Density Effect and Economic Threshold of Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

被引:5
|
作者
Du, Long [1 ]
Li, Xiao [1 ]
Chen, Jianhong [2 ]
Jiang, Xiaojing [1 ]
Ju, Qian [1 ]
Qu, Chunjuan [1 ]
Qu, Mingjing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Peanut Res Inst, Pest Biocontrol Lab, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Quanzhou Inst Agr Sci, Quanzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Peanut; Purple nutsedge; Interference; Economic threshold; WEED COMPETITION; INTERFERENCE; ESCULENTUS; GROWTH; YIELD; HERBICIDES; EFFICACY; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1007/s42106-019-00056-6
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Peanut is one of the most important oilseed crop grown in China. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) is a competitive perennial weed, which infests peanut fields in south China and causes considerable peanut yield losses. Information on the interference of purple nutsedge on peanut and its economic threshold (ET) in field is an integral component of integrated weed management system. This will help growers use herbicides more legitimately and reduce the amount of herbicide that is discharged into the environment. 2-year experiments were conducted to assess the infestation effects of purple nutsedge on peanut in pure stands (nutsedge density 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 120 and 160 plants m(-2)) and in natural weed infestation, respectively. Furthermore, the ET of purple nutsedge in peanut was determined according the quadratic equation reported by Cousens. The biomass of purple nutsedge with a density of 160 plants m(-2) in pure stand was less than that of natural weed infestation treatment. Compared with natural weed infestation treatments, lower yield loss in treatment of nutsedge 160 plants m(-2) indicated weaker interference on peanut. But the ET of purple nutsedge in peanut came down to 4-5 plants m(-2). The higher price of peanut than the cost of weed control and very high efficiency (90%) of imazapic could be the probable reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 316
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transforming peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) : a simple in planta method
    Wang, Chuan Tang
    Wang, Xiu Zhen
    Tang, Yue Yi
    Wu, Qi
    Li, Gui Jie
    Song, Guo Sheng
    Yu, Hong Tao
    Hui, Dong Qing
    Guo, Bao Tai
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2013, 14 (03) : 850 - 854
  • [42] A recirculating hydroponic system for studying peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Mackowiak, CL
    Wheeler, RM
    Stutte, GW
    Yorio, NC
    Ruffe, LM
    HORTSCIENCE, 1998, 33 (04) : 650 - 651
  • [43] LEAD ACCUMULATION AND TOXICITY IN PEANUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) SEEDLINGS
    Dogan, Muhittin
    Akgul, Hasan
    Tozlu, Ihatni
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2013, 22 (08): : 2350 - 2356
  • [44] Uptake and partitioning of cadmium by cultivars of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    M.J. McLaughlin
    M.J. Bell
    G.C. Wright
    G.D. Cozens
    Plant and Soil, 2000, 222 : 51 - 58
  • [45] Autotoxic potential of root exudates of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Liu, P.
    Wan, S. B.
    Jiang, L. H.
    Wang, C. B.
    Liu, Z. H.
    Zhao, H. J.
    Yu, S. F.
    Yang, L.
    ALLELOPATHY JOURNAL, 2010, 26 (02): : 197 - 205
  • [46] Progress in genetic engineering of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)-A review
    Krishna, Gaurav
    Singh, Birendra K.
    Kim, Eun-Ki
    Morya, Vivek K.
    Ramteke, Pramod W.
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (02) : 147 - 162
  • [47] Nutritional composition of new peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars
    Campos-Mondragon, M. G.
    Calderon De La Barca, A. M.
    Duran-Prado, A.
    Campos-Reyes, L. C.
    Oliart-Ros, R. M.
    Ortega-Garcia, J.
    Medina-Juarez, L. A.
    Angulo, O.
    GRASAS Y ACEITES, 2009, 60 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [48] Diclosulam systems for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Bailey, WA
    Wilcut, JW
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) : 807 - 814
  • [49] The genome donors of the groundnut/peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) revisited
    Singh, AK
    Smartt, J
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 1998, 45 (02) : 113 - 118
  • [50] The genome donors of the groundnut/peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) revisited
    A.K. Singh
    J. Smartt
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 1998, 45 : 113 - 116