Gains and Limits of MIMO Technology for Safety-Critical PLC Applications

被引:0
|
作者
Sadamori, Leyna [1 ]
Hunziker, Thomas [2 ]
Dominiak, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Dept Comp Sci, Univ Str 6, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Lucerne Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Technikumstr 21, CH-6048 Horw, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Many Power Line Communication (PLC) systems operate on top of multi-conductor infrastructures, which allows for the adoption of Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) techniques. Current channel models for MIMO PLC do not consider terminal conditions and are focused on optimizing the average case. For safety-critical applications, however, the line terminations are important, as system performance has to be guaranteed for any conditions-including the worst case. In this paper, we present an analytical and a SPICE1-simulated channel model based on transmission line theory that is capable of incorporating terminal networks. Further, we evaluate the channel capacity and compare three different systems that could be deployed in a multi-conductor environment: A Single Input Single Output (SISO) system, multiple parallel SISO systems and a MIMO system. With our channel model we show that the terminal conditions have an impact on the overall signal attenuation, but also that they affect the relative cross-talk level compared to direct channels. Although we can confirm existing findings that MIMO techniques do provide performance gains, our results show that this is only true above a certain signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). For low SNRs, these gains decrease and in worst case, the gains over a SISO system are lost. Also, parallel SISO systems do not offer robust performance gains over single SISO systems, which discourages their use for safety-critical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Programmable Aging Sensor for Automotive Safety-Critical Applications
    Vazquez, J. C.
    Champac, V.
    Teixeira, I. C.
    Santos, M. B.
    Teixeira, J. P.
    2010 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE (DATE 2010), 2010, : 618 - 621
  • [22] Verification and validation of neural networks for safety-critical applications
    Hull, J
    Ward, D
    Zakrzewski, RR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2002, 1-6 : 4789 - 4794
  • [23] Architectural concepts for embedded systems in safety-critical applications
    Skambraks, Martin
    Halang, Wolfgang A.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION, QUALITY AND TESTING, ROBOTICS (AQTR 2008), THETA 16TH EDITION, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 60 - 65
  • [24] Resilient PNT for Safety-Critical Applications Toughen and Augment!
    Meurer, Michael
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS+ 2016), 2016, : 974 - 987
  • [25] Editorial: Machine learning for safety-critical applications in engineering
    Kiran, Mariam
    Khan, Samir
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2020, 109 (05) : 1101 - 1102
  • [26] Applying Formal Methods into Safety-Critical Health Applications
    Gholami, Mohammad-Reza
    Boucheneb, Hanifa
    MODEL-BASED SAFETY AND ASSESSMENT, IMBSA 2014, 2014, 8822 : 195 - 209
  • [27] Licensing Reliable Embedded Software for Safety-Critical Applications
    Francesca Saglietti
    Real-Time Systems, 2004, 28 : 217 - 236
  • [28] Analysing user deviations in interactive safety-critical applications
    Paternò, F
    Santoro, C
    Fields, B
    DESIGN, SPECIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS'99, 1999, : 189 - 204
  • [29] COTS CPU selection guidelines for safety-critical applications
    Forsberg, Hakan
    Karlsson, Kristoffer
    2006 IEEE/AIAA 25TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1- 3, 2006, : 649 - +
  • [30] Challenges in Using Neural Networks in Safety-Critical Applications
    Forsberg, Hakan
    Linden, Joakim
    Hjorth, Johan
    Manefjord, Torbjom
    Daneshtalab, Masoud
    2020 AIAA/IEEE 39TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC) PROCEEDINGS, 2020,