Locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival predicted by [18F]FDG-PET/CT

被引:23
|
作者
Kauppi, Juha T. [1 ]
Oksala, Niku [2 ]
Salo, Jarmo A. [1 ]
Helin, Heikki [3 ]
Karhumaki, Lauri [4 ]
Kemppainen, Jukka [5 ]
Sihvo, Eero I. [1 ]
Rasanen, Jari V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Div Gen Thorac & Esophageal Surg, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ, Cent Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, SF-33520 Tampere, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Pathol, HUSLAB, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, HUSLAB, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[5] Turku Univ, PET Ctr, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; HISTOPATHOLOGIC RESPONSE; FDG-PET; CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; TRIAL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3109/0284186X.2011.643822
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. ([18F])fluorodeoxyglycose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography (([18F])FDG-PET/CT) is commonly used in staging of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Its predictive value for response to neoadjuvant therapy and survival after multimodality therapy is controversial. Methods. Sixty-six consecutive patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Staging was done prospectively with ([18F])FDG-PET/CT, before and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Pre- and post-therapy maximal standardized uptake values for the primary tumor (SUV1 and SUV2) were determined, and their relative change (SUV Delta%) calculated. Percentage change in SUV1 was compared with histopathologic response (HPR, complete or subtotal histologic remission), disease-free- (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results. Resection with negative margins was achieved in 60 patients. HPR rate was 14 of 66 (21.2%). Median follow-up was 16 months (range 4-72). For all patients, OS probability at three years was 59% and DFS 50%. In receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, HPR was optimally predicted by a > 67% change in baseline maximal SUV (sensitivity 79% and specificity 75%). In univariate survival analysis (Cox regression proportional hazards), HPR associated with improved DFS (HR 0.208, p = 0.033) but not OS (HR 0.030, p = 0.101), SUV Delta% > 67% associated with improved OS (HR 0.249, p = 0.027) and DFS (HR 0.383, p = 0.040). In a multivariate model (adjusted by age, sex, and ASA score), neither HPR nor SUV Delta% > 67% was predictive of improved OS and DFS. However, SUV Delta% as a continuous variable was an independent predictor of OS (HR 0.966, p < 0.0001) or DFS (HR 0.973, p < 0.0001). Conclusion. Our results support previous results showing that ([18F])FDG-PET/CT can distinguish a group of patients with worse prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. This information could offer a new independent preoperative marker of prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 644
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MRI and FDG-PET for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Toshisada Aiba
    Keisuke Uehara
    Takashi Nihashi
    Toyonori Tsuzuki
    Hiroshi Yatsuya
    Yuichiro Yoshioka
    Katsuhiko Kato
    Masato Nagino
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1801 - 1808
  • [22] [18F]FDG-PET/CT in extranodal lymphoma
    Sollini, M.
    Zangheri, B.
    Calabrese, L.
    Gasparini, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S687 - S688
  • [23] MRI and FDG-PET for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Aiba, Toshisada
    Uehara, Keisuke
    Nihashi, Takashi
    Tsuzuki, Toyonori
    Yatsuya, Hiroshi
    Yoshioka, Yuichiro
    Kato, Katsuhiko
    Nagino, Masato
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) : 1801 - 1808
  • [24] Treatment Strategies Guided by [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and [18F]FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes
    Olthof, Ester P.
    Wenzel, Hans H. B.
    van der Velden, Jacobus
    Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
    Mom, Constantijne H.
    van der Aa, Maaike A.
    [J]. CANCERS, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [25] Utility of repeated 18F-FDG PET/CT during induction chemotherapy to identify responders in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Razzouk-Cadet, M.
    Francois, E.
    Mouroux, J.
    Viau, P.
    Grangeon, C.
    Maurel, F.
    Thelu, M.
    Zwarthoed, C.
    Mahamat, A.
    Darcourt, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 : S195 - S196
  • [26] [18F]FDG-PET/CT and long-term response to everolimus in advanced neuroendocrine neoplasia
    Rinzivillo, M.
    Prosperi, D.
    Mazzuca, F.
    Magi, L.
    Iannicelli, E.
    Pilozzi, E.
    Franchi, G.
    Silveri, G. Gentiloni
    Laghi, A.
    Annibale, B.
    Signore, A.
    Panzuto, F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S782 - S782
  • [27] 18F-FDG-PET zur Therapieverlaufskontrolle beim Ösophaguskarzinom[18F]-FDG-PET in therapy response of esophageal cancer
    H.A. Wieder
    K. Herrmann
    B.J. Krause
    [J]. Der Radiologe, 2007, 47 (2): : 110 - 114
  • [28] [18F]-FDG-PET/CT Correlates With the Response of Radiorefractory Thyroid Cancer to Lenvatinib and Patient Survival
    Valerio, Laura
    Guidoccio, Federica
    Giani, Carlotta
    Tardelli, Elisa
    Puccini, Giulia
    Puleo, Luciana
    Minaldi, Elisa
    Boni, Giuseppe
    Elisei, Rossella
    Volterrani, Duccio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2021, 106 (08): : 2355 - 2366
  • [29] Whole-Body [18F]FDG-PET/MRI vs. [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Malignant Melanoma
    Dominik Berzaczy
    Barbara Fueger
    Christoph Hoeller
    Alexander R. Haug
    Anton Staudenherz
    Gundula Berzaczy
    Michael Weber
    Marius E. Mayerhoefer
    [J]. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2020, 22 : 739 - 744
  • [30] Whole-Body [18F]FDG-PET/MRI vs. [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Malignant Melanoma
    Berzaczy, Dominik
    Fueger, Barbara
    Hoeller, Christoph
    Haug, Alexander R.
    Staudenherz, Anton
    Berzaczy, Gundula
    Weber, Michael
    Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
    [J]. MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 22 (03) : 739 - 744