Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Trial of Tisseel/Tissucol for Mesh Fixation in Patients Undergoing Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair Results of the TIMELI Trial

被引:72
|
作者
Campanelli, Giampiero [1 ]
Hidalgo Pascual, Manuel [2 ]
Hoeferlin, Andreas
Rosenberg, Jacob [3 ]
Champault, Gerard [4 ]
Kingsnorth, Andrew [5 ]
Miserez, Marc [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria Varese, Dept Surg Sci, Multimed Santa Maria Hosp, I-21053 Castellanza, Varese, Italy
[2] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Surg, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[4] CH Jean Verdier, Bondy, France
[5] Derriford Hosp, Peninsula Med Sch, Plymouth PL6 8DH, Devon, England
[6] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Abdominal Surg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
CHRONIC PAIN; HERNIORRHAPHY; SCALES;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b32bf
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Test the hypothesis that fibrin sealant mesh fixation can reduce the incidence of postoperative pain/numbness/groin discomfort by up to 50% compared with sutures for repair of inguinal hernias using the Lichtenstein technique. Background: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in general surgery, thus improvements in surgical techniques, which reduce the burden of undesirable postoperative outcomes, are of clinical importance. Methods: A randomized, controlled, patient-and evaluator-blinded study (Tissucol/Tisseel for MEsh fixation in LIchtenstein hernia repair [TIMELI]; trial NCT00306839) was conducted among patients eligible for Lichtenstein repair of uncomplicated unilateral primary inguinal small-medium sized hernia. Patients were subject to mesh fixation with either fibrin sealant or sutures. Main outcome measures were visual analogue scale (VAS) assessments for "pain," "numbness," and "groin discomfort" on a scale of 0 = best and 100 = worst outcome. The primary endpoint was a composite that evaluated the prevalence of chronic disabling complications (VAS score > 30 for pain/numbness/groin discomfort) at 12 months after surgery. Results: In total, 319 patients were randomized between January 2006 and April 2007 (159 fibrin sealant, 160 sutures). At 12 months, the prevalence of 1 or more disabling complication was significantly lower in the fibrin sealant group than in the sutures group (8.1% vs 14.8%; P = 0.0344). Less pain was reported in the fibrin sealant group than in the sutures group at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.0132; P = 0.0052), as reflected by a lower proportion of patients using analgesics in the fibrin group over the study duration (65.2% vs 79.7%; P = 0.0009). Only 3 of 316 patients (0.9%) experienced recurrence. The incidences of wound-healing complications and other adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein repair of small-medium sized inguinal hernias is well tolerated and reduces the rate of pain/numbness/groin discomfort by 45% relative to sutures without increasing hernia recurrence (NCT00306839).
引用
下载
收藏
页码:650 / 657
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sexual dysfunction after inguinal hernia repair with the Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique: A randomized clinical trial
    Andresen, Kristoffer
    Burcharth, Jakob
    Fonnes, Siv
    Hupfeld, Line
    Rothman, Josephine Philip
    Deigaard, Soren
    Winther, Dorte
    Errebo, Maj-Britt
    Therkildsen, Rikke
    Hauge, Dina
    Sorensen, Fritz Sobaek
    Bjerg, Jesper
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    SURGERY, 2017, 161 (06) : 1690 - 1695
  • [42] Mesh fixation compared to nonfixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial in a rural center in India
    Pankaj Garg
    Srijith Nair
    Muhammed Shereef
    Jai Deep Thakur
    Nikhilesh Nain
    Geetha R. Menon
    Mohamed Ismail
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 3300 - 3306
  • [43] Mesh fixation compared to nonfixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial in a rural center in India
    Garg, Pankaj
    Nair, Srijith
    Shereef, Muhammed
    Thakur, Jai Deep
    Nain, Nikhilesh
    Menon, Geetha R.
    Ismail, Mohamed
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (10): : 3300 - 3306
  • [44] Lichtenstein vs anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: A prospective, randomized trial
    Muldoon R.L.
    Marchant K.
    Johnson D.D.
    Yoder G.G.
    Read R.C.
    Hauer-Jensen M.
    Hernia, 2004, 8 (2) : 98 - 103
  • [45] UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial
    J. Magnusson
    J. Nygren
    U. O. Gustafsson
    A. Thorell
    Hernia, 2016, 20 : 641 - 648
  • [46] Lichtenstein, Prolene Hernia System, and UltraPro Hernia System for primary inguinal hernia repair: one-year outcome of a prospective randomized controlled trial
    J. Magnusson
    J. Nygren
    A. Thorell
    Hernia, 2012, 16 : 277 - 285
  • [47] UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Magnusson, J.
    Nygren, J.
    Gustafsson, U. O.
    Thorell, A.
    HERNIA, 2016, 20 (05) : 641 - 648
  • [48] Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein repair vs the Valenti technique for inguinal hernia
    Mitura, K.
    Garnysz, K.
    Michalek, I.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (03) : 547 - 554
  • [49] Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein repair vs the Valenti technique for inguinal hernia
    K. Mitura
    K. Garnysz
    I. Michałek
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 547 - 554
  • [50] Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus lichtenstein - A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Bringman, S
    Ramel, S
    Heikkinen, TJ
    Englund, T
    Westman, B
    Anderberg, B
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (01) : 142 - 147