Microbiological quality of vacuum-packed pork meat: The influence of different technological factors on lactic acid bacteria growth

被引:0
|
作者
Daraba, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dunarea de Jos Univ Galati, Fac Food Sci & Engn, 111 Domneasca St, Galati, Romania
来源
关键词
pork meat; lactic acid bacteria; vacuum level; O-2; permeability; storage temperature;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental conditions provided by the preservation method are essential for the microbes to grow. Since the spoilage level is a count of microbes, essentially any microbe that is on the food product and can reproduce enough numbers can spoil the product. However, there are specific organisms known as specific spoilage organisms (SSO) that have been associated with spoilage in most foods produced today. Preservation of meat by vacuum-packaging does not stop the spoilage process but is prolonging the shelf-life of meat by influencing both the growth rate of bacteria and the microflora's profile. Because vacuum-packaging technology does not provide a perfect anaerobiosis and, on the other hand, the partial pressure of oxygen inside of the pack depends on oxygen transmission rate of the utilised packing materials as well as vacuum level, meat is exposed to many environmental factors which are favourable for the survival and propagation of the contaminating microbial flora mainly represented by total APC, psychrophillic and lactic acid bacteria. The present study is focused on the evolution of a typical spoilage bacteria group, respectively lactic acid bacteria group, as effect of modifying plastic film's oxygen rate transmission, vacuum levels or storage temperature.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 87
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reducing the psychrophillic bacteria hazard in vacuum-packed fresh pork meat by surface decontamination with lactic acid and lactic acid bacteria
    Daraba, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2007, 8 (02): : 278 - 286
  • [2] PREDICTIVE MODELING OF SURFACE GROWTH OF LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA IN VACUUM-PACKED MEAT
    NICOLAI, BM
    VANIMPE, JF
    VERLINDEN, B
    MARTENS, T
    VANDEWALLE, J
    DEBAERDEMAEKER, J
    [J]. FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 10 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [3] Microbiological quality of vacuum-packed retail ostrich meat in Spain
    Alonso-Calleja, C
    Martínez-Fernández, B
    Prieto, M
    Capita, R
    [J]. FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 21 (02) : 241 - 246
  • [4] THE D(-)LACTIC ACID AND ACETOIN DIACETYL AS POTENTIAL INDICATORS OF THE MICROBIAL QUALITY OF VACUUM-PACKED PORK AND MEAT-PRODUCTS
    DEPABLO, B
    ASENSIO, MA
    SANZ, B
    ORDONEZ, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1989, 66 (03): : 185 - 190
  • [5] Evaluation of Natural Antimicrobials on Typical Meat Spoilage Bacteria In Vitro and in Vacuum-Packed Pork Meat
    Schirmer, Bjorn Christian
    Langsrud, Solveig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2010, 75 (02) : M98 - M102
  • [6] Biopreservation of Refrigerated and Vacuum-Packed Dicentrarchus labrax by Lactic Acid Bacteria
    El Bassi, Leila
    Hassouna, Mnasser
    Shinzato, Naoya
    Matsui, Toru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2009, 74 (06) : M335 - M339
  • [7] A NUMERICAL TAXONOMIC STUDY OF LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA FROM VACUUM-PACKED BEEF, PORK, LAMB AND BACON
    SHAW, BG
    HARDING, CD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1984, 56 (01): : 25 - 40
  • [8] Characterization of the spoilage lactic acid bacteria in "sliced vacuum-packed cooked ham"
    Kalschne, Daneysa Lahis
    Womer, Rute
    Mattana, Ademir
    Sarmento, Mendes Pereira
    Colla, Luciane Maria
    Colla, Eliane
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 46 (01) : 173 - 181
  • [9] Lactic acid bacteria associated with vacuum-packed cooked meat product spoilage:: population analysis by rDNA-based methods
    Chenoll, E.
    Macian, M. C.
    Elizaquivel, P.
    Aznar, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 102 (02) : 498 - 508
  • [10] FACTORS CONTROLLING THE GROWTH OF GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA IN VACUUM-PACKED BOLOGNA
    COLLINSTHOMPSON, DL
    WOOD, D
    JONES, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1982, 45 (04) : 305 - 309