Mediastinal lymph node staging by FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of false-positive FDG-PET findings

被引:94
|
作者
Konishi, J
Yamazaki, K
Tsukamoto, E
Tamaki, N
Onodera, Y
Otake, T
Morikawa, T
Kinoshita, I
Dosaka-Akita, H
Nishimura, M
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med 1, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608638, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608638, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608638, Japan
[4] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg Oncol, Div Canc Med, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[5] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med Oncol, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
关键词
FDG-PET; non-small cell lung cancer; tumor staging; mediastinal lymph node; hilar lymph node;
D O I
10.1159/000074207
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Accurate staging of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is a critical factor determining operability in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Positron emission tomography with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose as a tracer (FDG-PET) has recently been reported to be more effective in detecting tumor involvement in mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes than computed tomography (CT). Objective: In this study, we analyzed the accuracy of FDG-PET in mediastinal and hilar lymph node staging in patients with NSCLC and the factors associated with false-positive or false-negative FDG-PET findings in mediastinal and hilar lymph node staging. Methods: Fifty-four patients with NSCLC who underwent preoperative analysis including chest CT and whole-body FDG-PET were evaluated retrospectively. Using FDG-PET, lesions were considered to be positive if a definite, localized area of higher uptake, excluding physiologic uptake, than in surrounding normal tissue was present. On CT findings, lymph nodes were considered to be positive if they were 110 mm in short-axis diameter, except subcarinal lymph nodes (#7), which were considered to be positive if they were >15 mm in short-axis diameter. All patients underwent surgical resection of primary tumors and mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes between 1999 and 2001 in our institute. Resected lymph nodes were histologically examined for the existence of tumor cells. Results: A total of 306 lymph nodes were resected and used for analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FDG-PET were 73, 98, 70 and 98%, while those of CT were 55, 96, 55 and 96%, respectively. When preoperative nodal staging was compared with post-operative histopathological staging, 44 patients (81%) were correctly staged, 7 (13%) were overstaged and 3 (6%) were understaged by FDG-PET, while 39 patients (72%) were correctly staged, 8 (15%) were overstaged and 7 (13%) were understaged by CT. All 7 overstaged patients by FDG-PET had other pulmonary complications, including interstitial pneumonitis (n = 2), previous pulmonary tuberculosis (n = 3), silicosis (n = 1) and emphysema ( n = 1), although they were not in the active stage. In 3 understaged patients by FDG-PET, lymph nodes were also undetectable by CT. Conclusion: FDG-PET is superior to CT in mediastinal and hilar lymph node staging of patients with NSCLC. However, care should be taken in lymph node staging for patients who have other pulmonary complications, including interstitial pneumonitis, previous pulmonary tuberculosis and silicosis. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF FDG-PET IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Bae, S. H.
    Ryoo, H. M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5 (05) : S64 - S64
  • [22] Diagnostic and prognostic values of FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Abe, Koichiro
    Baba, Shingo
    Kaneko, Koichiro
    Isoda, Takuro
    Yabuuchi, Hidetake
    Sasaki, Masayuki
    Sakai, Shuji
    Yoshino, Ichiro
    Honda, Hiroshi
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2009, 33 (02) : 90 - 95
  • [23] Spatial Analysis of FDG-PET Response to Radiotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Ohri, N.
    Werner-Wasik, M.
    Xiao, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S443 - S444
  • [24] FDG-PET for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer
    Crippa, F
    Gerali, A
    Alessi, A
    Agresti, R
    Bombardieri, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (Suppl 1) : S97 - S102
  • [25] Accuracy and clinical impact of mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET imaging in potentially resectable lung cancer
    Weng, E
    Tran, L
    Rege, S
    Safa, A
    Sadeghi, A
    Juillard, G
    Mark, R
    Santiago, S
    Brown, C
    Mandelkern, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 23 (01): : 47 - 52
  • [26] FDG-PET for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer
    Flavio Crippa
    Alberto Gerali
    Alessandra Alessi
    Roberto Agresti
    Emilio Bombardieri
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2004, 31 : S97 - S102
  • [27] Accuracy and clinical impact of mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET imaging in potentially resectable lung cancer
    Wang, EY
    Rege, SD
    Safa, AA
    Sadeghi, A
    Juillard, GF
    Tran, LM
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 163 - 164
  • [28] Nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer with FDG-PET and CT by correlative node mapping and sampling.
    Steinert, H
    Hauser, M
    Weder, W
    Berthold, T
    vonSchulthess, GK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 37 (05) : 476 - 476
  • [29] Lymph node staging in lung cancer using [18F]FDG-PET
    Halter, G
    Buck, AK
    Schirrmeister, H
    Aksoy, E
    Liewald, F
    Glatting, G
    Neumaier, B
    Mühling, B
    Nüssle-Kügele, K
    Hetzel, M
    Sunder-Plassmann, L
    Reske, SN
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2004, 52 (02): : 96 - 101
  • [30] False-Negative and False-Positive Results in FDG-PET and PET/CT in Breast Cancer
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Rani, Neerja
    Patel, Chetan
    Basu, Sandip
    Alavi, Abass
    PET CLINICS, 2009, 4 (03) : 289 - 298