A national survey of prevention of infection in obstetric central neuraxial blockade in the UK

被引:11
|
作者
McKenzie, A. G. [1 ]
Darragh, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Simpson Ctr Reprod Hlth, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Royal Infirm, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
EPIDURAL ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06705.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We conducted a postal survey of all consultant-led UK obstetric anaesthetic units in August 2009, to assess the standard of aseptic technique used for neuraxial blocks. One hundred and sixty-four units responded giving a response rate of 76%; 93% of units (149/160) follow recommended precautions and attach a bacterial micropore filter to the epidural catheter. Epidural top-ups are provided by 72% (116/162) of units, with about two thirds using premixed solutions (of local anaesthetic with opioid) in a variety of ways: 51% (57/111) via a continuous infusion pump; 47% (52/111) by a prefilled syringe; and 23% (25/111) by multiple use of a premixed bag of solution. For spinals, 91% of units (149/164) add diamorphine: of these 85% (126/149) draw the diamorphine from non-sterile-wrapped ampoules. If required to draw opioid from a non-sterile-wrapped ampoule, 86% (119/138) of units use a micropore filter and 21% (29/138) wipe the ampoule neck with an alcohol swab. Although sepsis secondary to neuraxial block in obstetric practice is uncommon (declared by 8.5% of units over an unspecified period of time), there is scope for further improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 502
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of obstetric emergencies in the accident and emergency department: a national survey of UK guidelines
    Sharma, S
    Varshney, S
    Davies, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2003, 12 (04) : 306 - 307
  • [32] Obstetric services in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national survey
    O'Carroll, James Edward
    Zucco, Liana
    Warwick, Eleanor
    Arbane, Gill
    Moonesinghe, Ramani
    El-Boghdadly, Kariem
    Guo, N.
    Carvalho, Brendan
    Sultan, Pervez
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (05)
  • [33] A national survey of neurological monitoring practice after obstetric regional anaesthesia in the UK
    Roderick, E.
    Hoyle, J.
    Yentis, S. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (06) : 755 - 759
  • [34] Pressure ulcers after obstetric neuraxial blockade. What's the risk?
    Harris, N.
    Hussain, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 167 - 167
  • [35] Horner's syndrome following obstetric neuraxial blockade - a systematic review of the literature
    Chambers, D. J.
    Bhatia, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2018, 35 : 75 - 87
  • [36] Massive obstetric haemorrhage: A survey of obstetric units in the UK
    McCheyne, J
    Arfeen, Z
    Evans, PR
    Misra, U
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (05) : A42 - A42
  • [37] Obstetric recovery practice: a survey of UK obstetric anaesthetists
    Walker, E
    Moore, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2005, 14 (03) : 193 - 199
  • [38] How UK obstetric anaesthetists assess neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: National surveys of practice conducted in 2004 and 2010
    Husain, T.
    Liu, Y. M.
    Fernando, R.
    Nagaratnam, V.
    Sodhi, M.
    Tamilselvan, P.
    Venkatesh, S.
    England, A.
    Columb, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2013, 22 (04) : 298 - 302
  • [39] Pressure sore as a possible complication of lower central neuraxial blockade
    Toshiya Tomioka
    Hiroshi Sekiyama
    Kazuo Hanaoka
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2003, 17 (3) : 201 - 203
  • [40] Skin antisepsis for central neuraxial blockade - an audit of trainee practice
    Stikans, C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 : 53 - 53