共 50 条
A national survey of prevention of infection in obstetric central neuraxial blockade in the UK
被引:11
|作者:
McKenzie, A. G.
[1
]
Darragh, K.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Simpson Ctr Reprod Hlth, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Royal Infirm, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源:
关键词:
EPIDURAL ANALGESIA;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06705.x
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
We conducted a postal survey of all consultant-led UK obstetric anaesthetic units in August 2009, to assess the standard of aseptic technique used for neuraxial blocks. One hundred and sixty-four units responded giving a response rate of 76%; 93% of units (149/160) follow recommended precautions and attach a bacterial micropore filter to the epidural catheter. Epidural top-ups are provided by 72% (116/162) of units, with about two thirds using premixed solutions (of local anaesthetic with opioid) in a variety of ways: 51% (57/111) via a continuous infusion pump; 47% (52/111) by a prefilled syringe; and 23% (25/111) by multiple use of a premixed bag of solution. For spinals, 91% of units (149/164) add diamorphine: of these 85% (126/149) draw the diamorphine from non-sterile-wrapped ampoules. If required to draw opioid from a non-sterile-wrapped ampoule, 86% (119/138) of units use a micropore filter and 21% (29/138) wipe the ampoule neck with an alcohol swab. Although sepsis secondary to neuraxial block in obstetric practice is uncommon (declared by 8.5% of units over an unspecified period of time), there is scope for further improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 502
页数:6
相关论文