Hearing Impairment in F-111 Maintenance Workers: the Study of Health Outcomes in Aircraft Maintenance Personnel (SHOAMP) General Health and Medical Study

被引:12
|
作者
Guest, Maya [1 ]
Boggess, May [2 ]
Attia, John
D'Este, Catherine
Brown, Anthony [3 ]
Gibson, Richard
Tavener, Meredith
Gardner, Ian [4 ]
Harrex, Warren [5 ]
Horsley, Keith [5 ]
Ross, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Hlth, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Stat, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Rural Hlth, Dubbo, NSW, Australia
[4] Def Ctr Occupat Hlth, Dept Def, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[5] Dept Vet Affairs, Woden, ACT, Australia
关键词
hearing loss; noise-induced hearing loss; depressive disorders; aircraft; maintenance; military service; risk factors; NOISE EXPOSURE; MILITARY PILOTS; RAT COCHLEA; JET FUEL; SOLVENTS; TOLUENE; CONSCRIPTS; ARMY; INDIVIDUALS; SOLDIERS;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.20867
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background We sought to examine hearing loss in a group from the Royal Australian Air Force who undertook fuel tank maintenance on F-111 aircraft, with exposure to formulations containing ototoxins, relative to two different comparison groups. Methods Using pure-tone audiometry, hearing thresholds were assessed in 614 exposed personnel, 513 technical-trade comparisons (different base, same job), and 403 nontechnical comparisons (same base, different job). We calculated percentage loss of hearing (PLH) and used regression models to examine whether there was an association between PLH and F-111 fuel tank maintenance, adjusting for possible confounders. In addition, the difference between the observed hearing thresholds and the expected thresholds based on an otologically normal population (ISO-7029-2003) was determined. Results The PLH ranged from nil to 96 (median 1.5, quartiles 0.3, 5.5). A logistic regression model showed no statistically significant difference in PLH among the three exposure groups (exposed vs. non-technical controls.1.1: 95% CI 0.7, 2.0 and exposed vs. technical OR 0.9: 95% CI 0.6, 1.3). The model also highlighted a number of other risk factors for PLH including age, tinnitus, smoking, depression, and use of depression medications. However; at all eight frequencies measured, all populations had lower than expected hearing thresholds based on published ISO-7029 medians. Conclusions Although there was no difference in PLH between the three exposure groups, the study did reveal a high degree of hearing loss between the 3 groups and a normal population. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:1159-1169,2010. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1169
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [31] Integrating habit science and learning theory to promote maintenance of behavior change: does adding text messages to a habit-based sleep health intervention (HABITs) improve outcomes for eveningness chronotype young adults? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Diaz, Marlen
    Patino, Estephania Ovalle
    Oliver, Sophia
    Tiab, Sondra S.
    Salazar, Nena
    Song, Jiyoung
    Dong, Lu
    Sarfan, Laurel D.
    Susman, Eli S.
    Agnew, Emma R.
    Gardner, Benjamin
    Harvey, Allison G.
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)