Machine learning to predict early recurrence after oesophageal cancer surgery

被引:38
|
作者
Rahman, S. A. [1 ]
Walker, R. C. [1 ]
Lloyd, M. A. [1 ]
Grace, B. L. [1 ]
van Boxel, G. I. [9 ]
Kingma, B. F. [9 ]
Ruurda, J. P. [9 ]
van Hillegersberg, R. [9 ]
Harris, S. [2 ]
Parsons, S. [3 ]
Mercer, S. [4 ]
Griffiths, E. A. [5 ]
O'Neill, J. R. [6 ]
Turkington, R. [8 ]
Fitzgerald, R. C. [7 ]
Underwood, T. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Canc Sci Unit, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Dept Publ Hlth Sci & Med Stat, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Surg, Nottingham, England
[4] Portsmouth Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Surg, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[5] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Univ Hosp Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge Oesophagogastr Ctr, Cambridge, England
[7] Univ Cambridge, Hutchison Med Res Council, Canc Unit, Cambridge, England
[8] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Canc Res & Cell Biol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[9] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
CHEMORADIOTHERAPY PLUS SURGERY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; PATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; VALIDATION; REGRESSION; RESECTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11461
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Early cancer recurrence after oesophagectomy is a common problem, with an incidence of 20-30 per cent despite the widespread use of neoadjuvant treatment. Quantification of this risk is difficult and existing models perform poorly. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for early recurrence after surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma using a large multinational cohort and machine learning approaches. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and had neoadjuvant treatment in one Dutch and six UK oesophagogastric units were analysed. Using clinical characteristics and postoperative histopathology, models were generated using elastic net regression (ELR) and the machine learning methods random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Finally, a combined (ensemble) model of these was generated. The relative importance of factors to outcome was calculated as a percentage contribution to the model. Results A total of 812 patients were included. The recurrence rate at less than 1 year was 29 center dot 1 per cent. All of the models demonstrated good discrimination. Internally validated areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) were similar, with the ensemble model performing best (AUC 0 center dot 791 for ELR, 0 center dot 801 for RF, 0 center dot 804 for XGB, 0 center dot 805 for ensemble). Performance was similar when internal-external validation was used (validation across sites, AUC 0 center dot 804 for ensemble). In the final model, the most important variables were number of positive lymph nodes (25 center dot 7 per cent) and lymphovascular invasion (16 center dot 9 per cent). Conclusion The model derived using machine learning approaches and an international data set provided excellent performance in quantifying the risk of early recurrence after surgery, and will be useful in prognostication for clinicians and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1042 / 1052
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Natural language processing and machine learning to predict outcomes after ovarian cancer surgery
    Barber, E. L.
    Garg, R.
    Simon, M. A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 49 - 49
  • [22] Application of machine learning to predict the recurrence-proneness for cervical cancer
    Tseng, Chih-Jen
    Lu, Chi-Jie
    Chang, Chi-Chang
    Chen, Gin-Den
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2014, 24 (06): : 1311 - 1316
  • [23] Application of machine learning to predict the recurrence-proneness for cervical cancer
    Chih-Jen Tseng
    Chi-Jie Lu
    Chi-Chang Chang
    Gin-Den Chen
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2014, 24 : 1311 - 1316
  • [24] Recurrence after surgery for early gastric cancer (EGC)
    Roukos, DH
    Paraschou, PS
    Lorenz, M
    Kitsakos, A
    Ioannou, HV
    Encke, A
    8TH WORLD CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL GASTRO-SURGICAL CLUB, 1998, : 121 - 125
  • [25] Recurrence after surgery for concurrent metastatic colorectal cancer: The perspective of bioinformatics and machine learning.
    Luo, Zhiwen
    Bi, Xinyu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [26] Using machine learning to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery
    Hui, Victor
    Litton, Edward
    Edibam, Cyrus
    Geldenhuys, Agneta
    Hahn, Rebecca
    Larbalestier, Robert
    Wright, Brian
    Pavey, Warren
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 64 (06)
  • [27] Machine learning radiomics to predict the early recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection: A multicentre cohort study
    Zhiyuan Bo
    Bo Chen
    Yi Yang
    Fei Yao
    Yicheng Mao
    Jiangqiao Yao
    Jinhuan Yang
    Qikuan He
    Zhengxiao Zhao
    Xintong Shi
    Jicai Chen
    Zhengping Yu
    Yunjun Yang
    Yi Wang
    Gang Chen
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2023, 50 : 2501 - 2513
  • [28] Machine learning radiomics to predict early recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection: a multicenter cohort study
    Bo, Zhiyuan
    Chen, Bo
    Yang, Yi
    Zhao, Zhengxiao
    Wang, Yi
    Chen, Gang
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [29] Machine learning radiomics to predict the early recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection: A multicentre cohort study
    Bo, Zhiyuan
    Chen, Bo
    Yang, Yi
    Yao, Fei
    Mao, Yicheng
    Yao, Jiangqiao
    Yang, Jinhuan
    He, Qikuan
    Zhao, Zhengxiao
    Shi, Xintong
    Chen, Jicai
    Yu, Zhengping
    Yang, Yunjun
    Wang, Yi
    Chen, Gang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (08) : 2501 - 2513
  • [30] Learning curve for oesophageal cancer surgery
    Sutton, DN
    Wayman, J
    Griffin, SM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 (10) : 1399 - 1402