Applying different resampling strategies in machine learning models to predict head-cut gully erosion susceptibility

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Fengjie [1 ]
Sahana, Mehebub [2 ]
Pahlevanzadeh, Bahareh [3 ]
Pal, Subodh Chandra [4 ]
Shit, Pravat Kumar [5 ]
Piran, Md Jalil [6 ]
Janizadeh, Saeid [7 ]
Band, Shahab S. [8 ]
Mosavi, Amir [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Coll Sci, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Reg Informat Ctr Sci & Technol RICeST, Res Dept Design & Syst Operat, Shiraz, Fars, Iran
[4] Univ Burdwan, Dept Geog, Barddhaman 713104, W Bengal, India
[5] Dept Geog & Environm Management, Medinipur, India
[6] Sejeong Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[7] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Nat Resources & Marine Sci, Dept Watershed Management Engn & Sci, Tehran 14115111, Iran
[8] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Future, Future Technol Res Ctr, 123 Univ Rd,Sect 3, Touliu 64002, Yunlin, Taiwan
[9] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Built Environm, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[10] Obuda Univ, John von Neumann Fac Informat, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Head-cut gully erosion; Resampling algorithms; Bootstrap; K-fold cross validation; Machine learning; Boosted regression tree; Support vector machine; Random forest; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PERFORMANCE; ENSEMBLE; ALGORITHM; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.026
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Gully erosion is one of the advanced forms of water erosion. Identifying the effective fac-tors and gully erosion predicting is one of the important tools to control and manage such phe-nomenon. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of four different resampling algorithms including cross-validation (5-fold and 10-fold) and bootstrapping (Bootstrap and Opti-mism bootstrap) on boosted regression tree (BRT), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) models in spatial modeling and evaluation of head-cut gully erosion in Konduran watershed. For this purpose, based on an extensive field survey, the points of the head-cut of the gully erosion were identified first, and a map of the distribution of head-cut gully erosion in the study area was prepared. Then 18 variable identify and prepare as factors affecting the occurrence of head-cut gully erosion. To assess the efficiency of the models, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used. that...>The results of the assessment indicated that the use of resampling algorithms increases the efficiency of the models. The integrated optimism-bootstrap-BRT, optimism-bootstrap-SVM, and Optimism-Bootstrap-RF models with AUC 0.85, 0.823 and 0.89 respectively, outperformed the cross-validation 5fold (BRT, SVM, RF), Cross-validation 10fold (BRT, SVM, RF) and Bootstrap (BRT, SVM, RF) integrated algorithms. (C) 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.
引用
收藏
页码:5813 / 5829
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of different boosting ensemble machine learning models and novel deep learning and boosting framework for head-cut gully erosion susceptibility
    Chen, Wei
    Lei, Xinxiang
    Chakrabortty, Rabin
    Pal, Subodh Chandra
    Sahana, Mehebub
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 284
  • [2] A methodological comparison of head-cut based gully erosion susceptibility models: Combined use of statistical and artificial intelligence
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Cerda, Artemi
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Tiefenbacher, John P.
    Lombardo, Luigi
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2020, 359
  • [3] Head-cut gully erosion susceptibility mapping in semi-arid region using machine learning methods: insight from the high atlas, Morocco
    Baiddah, Abdeslam
    Krimissa, Samira
    Hajji, Sonia
    Ismaili, Maryem
    Abdelrahman, Kamal
    El Bouzekraoui, Meryem
    Eloudi, Hasna
    Elaloui, Abdenbi
    Khouz, Abdellah
    Badreldin, Nasem
    Namous, Mustapha
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [4] Evaluation of different machine learning models for predicting and mapping the susceptibility of gully erosion
    Rahmati, Omid
    Tahmasebipour, Nasser
    Haghizadeh, Ali
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2017, 298 : 118 - 137
  • [5] Comparison of machine learning models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping
    Alireza Arabameri
    Wei Chen
    Marco Loche
    Xia Zhao
    Yang Li
    Luigi Lombardo
    Artemi Cerda
    Biswajeet Pradhan
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2020, 11 (05) : 1609 - 1620
  • [6] Comparison of machine learning models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping
    Alireza Arabameri
    Wei Chen
    Marco Loche
    Xia Zhao
    Yang Li
    Luigi Lombardo
    Artemi Cerda
    Biswajeet Pradhan
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. Geoscience Frontiers , 2020, (05) : 1609 - 1620
  • [7] Comparison of machine learning models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Chen, Wei
    Loche, Marco
    Zhao, Xia
    Li, Yang
    Lombardo, Luigi
    Cerda, Artemi
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2020, 11 (05) : 1609 - 1620
  • [8] Gully erosion susceptibility prediction in Mollisols using machine learning models
    Wang, Y.
    Zhang, Y.
    Chen, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2023, 78 (05) : 385 - 396
  • [9] Head-cut gully erosion susceptibility modelling based on ensemble Random Forest with oblique decision trees in Fareghan watershed, Iran
    Pham, Quoc Bao
    Mukherjee, Kaustuv
    Norouzi, Akbar
    Linh, Nguyen Thi Thuy
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    Ahmadi, Kourosh
    Cerda, Artemi
    Doan, Thi Ngoc Canh
    Anh, Duong Tran
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2020, 11 (01) : 2385 - 2410
  • [10] Gully Head-Cut Distribution Modeling Using Machine Learning Methods-A Case Study of NW Iran
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Chen, Wei
    Blaschke, Thomas
    Tiefenbacher, John P.
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (01)