Robotic Adrenalectomy: Are We Expanding the Indications of Minimally Invasive Surgery?

被引:6
|
作者
Quadri, Pablo [1 ,3 ]
Esposito, Sofia [2 ]
Coleoglou, Adrian [1 ]
Danielson, Kirstie K. [1 ,2 ]
Masrur, Mario [1 ]
Giulianotti, Pier C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Surg, Div Gen Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Chicago, IL USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Dept Surg, 3635 Vista Ave,Surg Educ 3FDT, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
adrenalectomy; robotic adrenalectomy; endocrine surgery; minimally invasive adrenalectomy; LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY; ASSISTED ADRENALECTOMY; FEASIBILITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2018.0286
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is accepted as the gold standard treatment for most adrenal pathologies. Open surgery is still considered the standard of care for large tumors and malignancies. In the past decade, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has become an alternative to the laparoscopic and open approaches. The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative and postoperative outcomes in a series of consecutive nonselected patients undergoing a RA, to determine whether factors that negatively affect outcomes in LA (body mass index [BMI], size, and side of the tumor) have the same impact in RA. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center single-surgeon retrospective study with 43 patients who underwent a RA. Patients were divided into different groups according to tumor size (cutoff values of 5 or 8cm), tumor side (left/right), and BMI (cutoff value of kg/m(2)). Perioperative and postoperative outcomes included operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, readmissions, complications, and conversions to open. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups with tumors <5cm versus 5cm regarding gender, age, race, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, history of previous abdominal surgery, tumor side, and histopathological diagnosis (all P values .06). There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes analyzed with respect to the tumor size (all P values .14) except for a higher occurrence of complications in patients with tumors 8cm versus <8cm (P=.03). There were no significant differences in any outcomes related to side (left versus right) of the tumor nor BMI (<30 versus 30kg/m(2)). The overall readmission and conversion rates were both 2.3% and no mortalities were registered. Conclusion: Patient's BMI, tumor side, and size did not demonstrate a negative impact on perioperative and postoperative outcomes of RA. This approach could potentially expand the indications of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 23
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery-will robotic surgery be the future?
    Dittrich, Luca
    Biebl, Matthias
    Malinka, Thomas
    Knoop, Michael
    Pratschke, Johann
    [J]. EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2021, 53 (04): : 158 - 165
  • [32] Minimally invasive adrenalectomy in children
    Heloury, Yves
    Muthucumaru, Mathie
    Panabokke, Gayathri
    Cheng, Wei
    Kimber, Christopher
    Leclair, Marc David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2012, 47 (02) : 415 - 421
  • [33] Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature
    Pal, Raj P.
    Koupparis, Anthony J.
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 16 (03) : 270 - 284
  • [34] Complications of minimally invasive adrenalectomy
    Alesina, P. F.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2015, 86 (01): : 29 - 32
  • [35] Minimally invasive retroperitoneal adrenalectomy
    BinYousef, Hussam M.
    Al-Zaben, Mohammed A.
    Murshid, Essam M.
    Al-Shahid, Mona A.
    [J]. SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (12) : 1901 - 1903
  • [36] Minimally Invasive Surgery: Are We Doing It Right?
    Harshal A. Chohatakar
    Vibha Ramesh
    Niranjan Paramashivaiah
    Krishnaswamy Lakshman
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2021, 83 : 1185 - 1191
  • [37] Minimally Invasive Surgery: Are We Doing It Right?
    Chohatakar, Harshal A.
    Ramesh, Vibha
    Paramashivaiah, Niranjan
    Lakshman, Krishnaswamy
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 83 (05) : 1185 - 1191
  • [38] Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications
    Swenson, Carolyn W.
    Kamdar, Neil S.
    Harris, John A.
    Uppal, Shitanshu
    Campbell, Darrell A., Jr.
    Morgan, Daniel M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (05) : 650.e1 - 650.e8
  • [39] Highly Articulated Robotic Probe for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Degani, Amir
    Choset, Howie
    Zubiate, Brett
    Ota, Takeyoshi
    Zenati, Marco
    [J]. 2008 30TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 3273 - +
  • [40] VERROTOUCH: VIBROTACTILE FEEDBACK FOR ROBOTIC MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY
    McMahan, William
    Gewirtz, Jamie
    Standish, Dorsey
    Martin, Paul
    Kunkel, Jacquelyn
    Lilavois, Magalie
    Wedmid, Alexei
    Lee, David I.
    Kuchenbecker, Katherine J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E373 - E373