Robotic Adrenalectomy: Are We Expanding the Indications of Minimally Invasive Surgery?

被引:6
|
作者
Quadri, Pablo [1 ,3 ]
Esposito, Sofia [2 ]
Coleoglou, Adrian [1 ]
Danielson, Kirstie K. [1 ,2 ]
Masrur, Mario [1 ]
Giulianotti, Pier C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Surg, Div Gen Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Chicago, IL USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Dept Surg, 3635 Vista Ave,Surg Educ 3FDT, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
adrenalectomy; robotic adrenalectomy; endocrine surgery; minimally invasive adrenalectomy; LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY; ASSISTED ADRENALECTOMY; FEASIBILITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2018.0286
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is accepted as the gold standard treatment for most adrenal pathologies. Open surgery is still considered the standard of care for large tumors and malignancies. In the past decade, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has become an alternative to the laparoscopic and open approaches. The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative and postoperative outcomes in a series of consecutive nonselected patients undergoing a RA, to determine whether factors that negatively affect outcomes in LA (body mass index [BMI], size, and side of the tumor) have the same impact in RA. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center single-surgeon retrospective study with 43 patients who underwent a RA. Patients were divided into different groups according to tumor size (cutoff values of 5 or 8cm), tumor side (left/right), and BMI (cutoff value of kg/m(2)). Perioperative and postoperative outcomes included operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, readmissions, complications, and conversions to open. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups with tumors <5cm versus 5cm regarding gender, age, race, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, history of previous abdominal surgery, tumor side, and histopathological diagnosis (all P values .06). There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes analyzed with respect to the tumor size (all P values .14) except for a higher occurrence of complications in patients with tumors 8cm versus <8cm (P=.03). There were no significant differences in any outcomes related to side (left versus right) of the tumor nor BMI (<30 versus 30kg/m(2)). The overall readmission and conversion rates were both 2.3% and no mortalities were registered. Conclusion: Patient's BMI, tumor side, and size did not demonstrate a negative impact on perioperative and postoperative outcomes of RA. This approach could potentially expand the indications of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 23
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive and robotic surgery
    Mack, MJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (05): : 568 - 572
  • [2] A comparison of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancies
    Jonathan J. Hue
    Peter Ahorukomeye
    Katherine Bingmer
    Lauren Drapalik
    John B. Ammori
    Scott M. Wilhelm
    Luke D. Rothermel
    Christopher W. Towe
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 5374 - 5381
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: Technical Aspects of the Laparoscopic and the Robotic Approach
    Makkai-Popa, Silviu Tiberiu
    Pascotto, Beniamino
    Arru, Luca
    De Blasi, Vito
    Goergen, Martine
    Azagra, Juan Santiago
    [J]. CHIRURGIA, 2020, 115 (01) : 80 - 88
  • [4] Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery
    Wexner, Steven D.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (10) : 1217 - 1218
  • [5] A comparison of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancies
    Hue, Jonathan J.
    Ahorukomeye, Peter
    Bingmer, Katherine
    Drapalik, Lauren
    Ammori, John B.
    Wilhelm, Scott M.
    Rothermel, Luke D.
    Towe, Christopher W.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (07): : 5374 - 5381
  • [6] ROBOTIC SUTURING IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY
    Yen, Jia-Yush
    Kang, Hao-Xiang
    Shen, Kuan
    Chen, Yung-Yaw
    Ho, Ming-Chih
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN, 2020, 28 (05): : 411 - 421
  • [7] The Era of Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Rha, Koon Ho
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 54 (08) : 491 - 491
  • [8] Minimally invasive, robotic cardiac surgery
    Rodriguez, Evelio
    Chitwood, W. Randolph, Jr.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (01): : 357 - 358
  • [9] Minimally invasive surgery and robotic surgery: surgery 4.0?
    Feussner, H.
    Wilhelm, D.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (03): : 189 - 194
  • [10] MINIMALLY INVASIVE CANCER SURGERY: INDICATIONS AND OUTCOMES
    Sun, Virginia
    Fong, Yuman
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2017, 33 (01) : 23 - 36