Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty

被引:73
|
作者
Moreta, Jesus [1 ]
Aguirre, Urko [2 ]
Saez de Ugarte, Oskar [1 ]
Jauregui, Inaki [1 ]
Martinez-De Los Mozos, Jose Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Res Unit, Bizkaia, Spain
关键词
Periprosthetic fractures; Hip arthroplasty; Femur; RISK-FACTORS; FEMUR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; COMORBIDITY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the functional and radiological results of the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Materials and methods: A review was performed of all periprosthetic femur fractures after a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) treated at our institution from 1995 to 2011. Functional outcome was assessed in terms of the Harris Hip Score and ambulatory status. Radiological findings were classified using Beals and Tower's criteria. Results: A total of 59 periprosthetic fractures were identified in 58 patients. The mean age of patients was 79 years old and the mean follow-up time was 33.6 months. Local risk factors were identified in 71% of the patients, principally osteoporosis (59%), followed by osteolysis (24%) and loosening of the stem (19%). In the multivariable analysis, the presence of local risk factors was associated with worsening of patients' ambulatory status. According to the Vancouver classification, there were 8 type A, 46 type B and 5 type C fractures. Of the type B fractures 24 were B1, 14 were B2 and 8 were B3. Fracture union was achieved in 54 fractures, with a mean union time of 6 months. Applying Beals and Tower's criteria, radiological results were excellent in 20 patients (34%), good in 22 (37%), and poor in 17 (29%). None of the patients improved their ability to walk after these fractures and 31 patients (52%) did not regain their prefracture walking status. The mean Harris Hip Score postoperatively was 67.9. There were major or minor complications in 33 patients (56%) and 11 patients (19%) required further operations. Conclusion: Although this study shows good radiological results following methods of treatment in accordance with the Vancouver classification, there was marked functional deterioration in many patients and a high rate of complications. Local risk factors were associated with poorer ambulatory status. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Radiological and Functional Results of Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture During Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery
    Kargin, Deniz
    Incesoy, M. Alper
    Albayrak, Akif
    Oner, Ali
    Ilvan, Gizem
    Kaygusuz, M. Akif
    BEZMIALEM SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (04): : 238 - 241
  • [32] Biomechanics of Osteosynthesis in Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Skala-Rosenbaum, J.
    Dzupa, V
    Krbec, M.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2020, 87 (05) : 309 - 317
  • [33] Risk factors and prevention strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty
    Alimy, Assil-Ramin
    Soltys, Pauline Julie
    Hubert, Jan
    Ries, Christian
    Beil, Frank Timo
    Rolvien, Tim
    ORTHOPADIE, 2024, 53 (12): : 966 - 973
  • [34] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Cottino, Umberto
    Mabry, Tad M.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 2005 - 2010
  • [35] Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: Current concepts in their management
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    Pavlou, George
    Venkatesh, Ram
    Bobak, Peter
    Gie, Graham
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 19 (02) : 75 - 86
  • [36] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Matthew P. Abdel
    Umberto Cottino
    Tad M. Mabry
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 2005 - 2010
  • [37] Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty
    King, Samuel W.
    Lamb, Jonathan N.
    Cage, Emily S.
    Pandit, Hemant
    MATURITAS, 2018, 117 : 1 - 5
  • [38] The reliability and validity of the modified Unified Classification System for periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty
    Fan, Meng-Qiang
    Fan, Xiao-Hong
    Chen, Xiao-Lei
    Shen, Jian-Jian
    Jiang, Xian-Jun
    Li, Xu-Song
    Huang, Jie-Feng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2021, 26 (03) : 385 - 388
  • [39] Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: operative management and functional outcome
    Sebastian Wutzler
    Helmut L. Laurer
    Stefan Huhnstock
    Emanuel V. Geiger
    Volker Buehren
    Ingo Marzi
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2009, 129 : 237 - 243
  • [40] Hip Arthroplasty Femoral Stem Designs and Their Association With Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
    Calkins, Tyler E.
    Goetz, Devon D.
    Zalewski, Jacob T.
    Jones, Caleb A.
    Gaumer, Peyton R.
    Ford, Marcus C.
    Toy, Patrick C.
    Crockarell, John R.
    Harkess, James W.
    Mihalko, William M.
    Guyton, James L.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (05): : 849 - 854