A hybrid heuristic approach with adaptive scalarization for linear semivectorial bilevel programming and its application

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Hong [1 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Xidian Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Xian 710126, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Linear semivectorial bilevel programming; Multiobjective optimization; Adaptive scalarization; Hybrid differential evolution; Production-distribution planning problem; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; PENALTY; ALGORITHM; OPTIMALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12293-022-00379-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article focuses on a heuristic solution strategy with adaptive scalarization for linear semivectorial bilevel programming (LSVBLP) as well as its practical application. An adaptive scalarization approach is adopted to the lower level multiobjective optimization problem to make it become a single objective linear programming (LP). The linear bilevel formulation can be reformulated as single-level programming with complementary constraints using the duality theory of LP, such that it is now equivalent to a single-level mixed-integer LP. To solve this resulting mixed-integer LP, a specific variable grouping strategy is proposed to reduce the computational complexity, in which all variables are divided into two groups: one group includes mixed-integer variables, and the other group only contains real-valued variables. In each iteration, the mixed-integer variables in the first group only need to be obtained by the improved mixed-coding differential evolution, while the pure real-valued variables in the second group are obtained by an LP solver. Experimental results on some numerical instances indicate that the proposed hybrid heuristic algorithm is comparable to or better than other algorithms in the literature. To demonstrate its practicability, a customer-oriented production-distribution planning problem is modeled as an LSVBLP, and then the model is solved effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 449
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An extended Kuhn-Tucker approach for linear bilevel programming
    Shi, CG
    Lu, J
    Zhang, GQ
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 162 (01) : 51 - 63
  • [32] MULTIOBJECTIVE LINEAR BILEVEL PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS: A COMPROMISE SOLUTION APPROACH
    Azarmir, N.
    Zohrehbandian, M.
    [J]. ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 15 (04): : 123 - 131
  • [33] A Cutting Plane Approach for Solving Linear Bilevel Programming Problems
    Jahanshahloo, Almas
    Zohrehbandian, Majid
    [J]. ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 358 : 3 - 13
  • [34] A choice of bilevel linear programming solving parameters: factoraggregation approach
    Orlovs, Pavels
    Montvida, Olga
    Asmuss, Svetlana
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY (EUSFLAT-13), 2013, 32 : 489 - 496
  • [35] A hybrid Tabu-ascent algorithm for the linear bilevel programming problem
    Gendreau, M
    Marcotte, P
    Savard, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 8 (03) : 217 - 233
  • [36] Hybrid particle swarm optimization for solving linear bilevel programming problems
    Pei, Zhenkui
    Tian, Shengfeng
    Huang, Houkuan
    [J]. PROGRESS IN INTELLIGENCE COMPUTATION AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 724 - 727
  • [37] GRAY LINEAR-PROGRAMMING, ITS SOLVING APPROACH, AND ITS APPLICATION
    HUANG, GH
    MOORE, RD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1993, 24 (01) : 159 - 172
  • [38] An interval programming approach for the bilevel linear programming problem under fuzzy random environments
    Ren, Aihong
    Wang, Yuping
    Xue, Xingsi
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 18 (05) : 995 - 1009
  • [39] An interval programming approach for the bilevel linear programming problem under fuzzy random environments
    Aihong Ren
    Yuping Wang
    Xingsi Xue
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2014, 18 : 995 - 1009
  • [40] Finding an efficient solution to linear bilevel programming problem: An effective approach
    Wen, UP
    Lin, SF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 8 (03) : 295 - 306