Dynamic Amazonia: The EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement and Deforestation

被引:8
|
作者
Arima, Eugenio [1 ]
Barreto, Paulo [2 ]
Taheripour, Farzad [3 ]
Aguiar, Angel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Geog & Environm, 305 E 23rd St,A3100, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Amazon Inst People & Environm IMAZON, Ed Zion Business,Tv Dom Romualdo de Seixas 1698, BR-66055200 Belem, Para, Brazil
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, 403 West State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
commodities; land change; international trade; supply chain; PROTECTED AREAS; BRAZILIAN AMAZON; MODEL; CHALLENGES; DRIVERS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/land10111243
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The trade agreement between the European Union and the Mercosur countries will increase deforestation in the Mercosur countries and Brazil, in particular, if ratified by member countries. We use a computable general equilibrium model to analyze how trade, land use, and agricultural production will change as a result of the agreement. We then use a statistical model to spatially allocate the predicted deforestation within the Brazilian Amazon. The models estimate that the agreement will cause additional deforestation in Brazil ranging from 56 to 173 thousand ha to accommodate increases in cropland area, depending on the level of governance, use of double-cropping techniques, and trade elasticity parameters. Most additional deforestation in Amazonia would be clustered near current deforestation hotspot areas. Some hotspots threaten the integrity of Indigenous lands and conservation units. Although a low deforestation scenario with gains in welfare is theoretically possible when high governance and multiple-cropping systems are in place, political challenges remain and cast doubt on Brazil's ability to rein on illegal deforestation.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EU sugar industry asks for delay of Mercosur agreement
    不详
    [J]. SUGAR INDUSTRY-ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2018, 143 (02): : 77 - 77
  • [32] The European Union and MERCOSUR: Prospects for a free trade agreement
    Bulmer-Thomas, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERAMERICAN STUDIES AND WORLD AFFAIRS, 2000, 42 (01): : 1 - +
  • [33] Free Trade, Environment, Agriculture, and Plurilateral Treaties: The Ambivalent Example of Mercosur, CETA, and the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement
    Heyl, Katharine
    Ekardt, Felix
    Roos, Paula
    Stubenrauch, Jessica
    Garske, Beatrice
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [34] Obstacles to free movement caused by acts of groups of private individuals in both sides of the Atlantic: Eu-MERCOSUR
    Lozano Contreras, Fernando
    [J]. REVISTA DE DERECHO COMUNITARIO EUROPEO, 2007, 11 (26): : 105 - 123
  • [35] Fading green? Environmental politics in the Mercosur Free Trade Agreement
    Hochstetler, K
    [J]. LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY, 2003, 45 (04) : 1 - 32
  • [36] THE WELFARE IMPACT OF A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SACU AND MERCOSUR
    Sandrey, Ron
    Jensen, Hans Grinsted
    Vink, Nick
    [J]. AGREKON, 2011, 50 (01) : 16 - 35
  • [37] Unpacking the impact of mega-regional agreements: the EU-Mercosur case (vol 45, pg 1418, 2024)
    Tostes, Ana Paula
    Albuquerque, Marianna
    [J]. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2024, 45 (08) : 0I - 0I
  • [38] Transaction costs and trade liberalization: An empirical perspective from the MERCOSUR agreement
    Valdes, Rodrigo
    Von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan
    Engler, Alejandra
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2015, 55 : 109 - 116
  • [39] Deforestation and the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement
    Peinhardt, Clint
    Kim, Alisha A.
    Pavon-Harr, Viveca
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2019, 19 (01) : 53 - 76
  • [40] MERCOSUR-EU AGREEMENT: PROMOTERS SECTORS IN BRAZIL AND CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR INTEGRATION
    Cecilia Miguez, Maria
    Crivelli, Agustin
    [J]. REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES-COSTA RICA, 2014, (144): : 117 - 131