Imputation of race/ethnicity to enable measurement of HEDIS performance by race/ethnicity

被引:40
|
作者
Haas, Ann [1 ]
Elliott, Marc N. [2 ]
Dembosky, Jacob W. [1 ]
Adams, John L. [3 ]
Wilson-Frederick, Shondelle M. [4 ]
Mallett, Joshua S. [2 ]
Gaillot, Sarah [5 ]
Haffer, Samuel C. [6 ]
Haviland, Amelia M. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA 90401 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Effectiveness & Safety Res, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Ctr Medicare & Medicaid Serv, Off Minor Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Ctr Medicare & Medicaid Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] US Equal Employment Opportun Commiss, Washington, DC USA
[7] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
biostatistical methods; HEDIS; Medicare; quality of care/patient safety (measurement); racial/ethnic differences in health and health care; RACIAL/ETHNIC DISPARITIES; MEDICARE; ETHNICITY; ACCURACY; CODES; CAHPS; BIAS; RACE;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.13099
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To improve an existing method, Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (MBISG) 1.0 that augments the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) administrative measure of race/ethnicity with surname and geographic data to estimate race/ethnicity. Data Sources/Study Setting Data from 284 627 respondents to the 2014 Medicare CAHPS survey. Study Design We compared performance (cross-validated Pearson correlation of estimates and self-reported race/ethnicity) for several alternative models predicting self-reported race/ethnicity in cross-sectional observational data to assess accuracy of estimates, resulting in MBISG 2.0. MBISG 2.0 adds to MBISG 1.0 first name, demographic, and coverage predictors of race/ethnicity and uses a more flexible data aggregation framework. Data Collection/Extraction Methods We linked survey-reported race/ethnicity to CMS administrative and US census data. Principal Findings MBISG 2.0 removed 25-39 percent of the remaining MBISG 1.0 error for Hispanics, Whites, and Asian/Pacific Islanders (API), and 9 percent for Blacks, resulting in correlations of 0.88 to 0.95 with self-reported race/ethnicity for these groups. Conclusions MBISG 2.0 represents a substantial improvement over MBISG 1.0 and the use of CMS administrative data on race/ethnicity alone. MBISG 2.0 is used in CMS' public reporting of Medicare Advantage contract HEDIS measures stratified by race/ethnicity for Hispanics, Whites, API, and Blacks.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 23
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Race and ethnicity matters
    Park, P
    SCIENTIST, 2002, 16 (18): : 16 - 16
  • [32] Hypertension and race/ethnicity
    Deere, Bradley P.
    Ferdinand, Keith C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (04) : 342 - 350
  • [33] Race versus ethnicity
    Blumenthal, DS
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (12) : 1259 - 1259
  • [34] RIDDLE: Race and ethnicity Imputation from Disease history with Deep LEarning
    Kim, Ji-Sung
    Gao, Xin
    Rzhetsky, Andrey
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (04)
  • [35] Race and ethnicity, revisited. A comment on Wacquant's "race as denegated ethnicity"
    Wimmer, Andreas
    ETHNICITIES, 2024,
  • [36] RACE/ETHNICITY AND THE MEASUREMENT OF COGNITION IN NSHAP: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ROBUSTNESS
    Iveniuk, James
    Lee, Haena
    Zhong, Selena
    Wilder, Jocelyn
    Marshall, Gillian
    Patricia, Boyle
    Piedra, Lissette
    Riley, Alicia
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2023, 7 : 72 - 72
  • [37] RACE/ETHNICITY AND MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE OF THE EVERYDAY DISCRIMINATION SCALE
    Kim, G.
    Sellbom, M.
    Ford, K.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 53 : 52 - 52
  • [38] Deconstructing race and ethnicity - Implications for measurement of health outcomes
    Manly, Jennifer J.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (11) : S10 - S16
  • [39] Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status: Measurement and methodological issues
    Williams, DR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 1996, 26 (03): : 483 - 505
  • [40] Race/Ethnicity and Measurement Equivalence of the Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Kim, Giyeon
    Sellbom, Martin
    Ford, Katy-Lauren
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 26 (03) : 892 - 900