Pros and cons of screening for occult Cushing syndrome

被引:46
|
作者
Tabarin, Antoine [1 ]
Perez, Paul [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux 2, Ctr Hosp Univ Bordeaux, Dept Endocrinol, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Bordeaux 2, Ctr Hosp Univ Bordeaux, Clin Epidemiol Unit USMR, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux 2, Ctr Hosp Univ Bordeaux, INSERM, CIC EC 7, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
关键词
NIGHT SALIVARY CORTISOL; MIDNIGHT SERUM CORTISOL; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; ADRENAL INCIDENTALOMA; SUBCLINICAL HYPERCORTISOLISM; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; POLYCYSTIC OVARIES; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; DIABETIC-PATIENTS; SINGLE-UNIT;
D O I
10.1038/nrendo.2011.51
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Systematic screening studies performed mainly in patients with diabetes mellitus have revealed an unexpectedly high prevalence of occult Cushing syndrome. Such studies may provide a rationale for systematically screening obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, a screening strategy is only justified if it is supported by enough evidence of its efficacy and if the benefits will outweigh drawbacks. To date, the natural history of occult Cushing syndrome and its possible effect on long-term morbidity are unknown. The clinical spectrum of occult Cushing syndrome and its relatively low prevalence may potentially negatively affect the performance of endocrine tests used to diagnose overt Cushing syndrome and generate false positives. Whether the cure of occult Cushing syndrome favorably influences clinical outcomes and is more beneficial than treatment of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk factors with currently available pharmacological tools remains to be demonstrated. Last, the acceptability of a screening program by professionals and the health-care system in terms of workload and costs is highly questionable. Thus, an assessment of the indications for and against screening for occult Cushing syndrome on the basis of currently available data suggests that, to date, the cons surpass the pros.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pros cons
    Dean, B
    [J]. STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2002, 24 (02) : 53 - 54
  • [42] PROS AND CONS
    不详
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1977, (18) : 743 - 743
  • [43] PROS AND CONS
    REITINGER, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 123 (08): : 17 - 17
  • [44] The pros and cons
    Jouffroy, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. PENSEE, 2013, (374): : 57 - +
  • [45] PROS AND CONS
    ALSTEAD, S
    [J]. LANCET, 1949, 257 (SEP10): : 490 - 490
  • [46] Pros & Cons
    Herr, Yeek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2011, 41 (02): : 53 - 53
  • [47] Pros cons
    Hagerman, P
    [J]. STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2001, 23 (06): : 36 - 36
  • [48] The pros and cons
    Jones, Royston
    [J]. Design Engineering (London), 2002, (JAN.):
  • [49] Fluids in acute respiratory distress syndrome: pros and cons
    Silva, Pedro L.
    Pelosi, Paolo
    Rocco, Patricia R. M.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 20 (01) : 104 - 112
  • [50] Pros and cons of breast cancer screening: Knowledge in lay women
    Morere, J-F
    Pivot, X.
    Touboul, C.
    Viguier, J.
    Blay, J-Y
    Coscas, Y.
    Lhomel, C.
    Eisinger, F.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73