Mixed Effects of Neighborhood Revitalization on Residents' Cardiometabolic Health

被引:3
|
作者
Troxel, Wendy M. [1 ]
Bogart, Andy [2 ]
Holliday, Stephanie Brooks [3 ]
Dubowitz, Tamara [1 ]
Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie [2 ]
Baird, Matthew D. [4 ]
Gary-Webb, Tiffany L. [5 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Behav & Policy Sci Div, 4570 Fifth Ave,Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] RAND Corp, Econ Sociol & Stat Div, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] RAND Corp, Behav & Policy Sci Div, Santa Monica, CA USA
[4] RAND Corp, Econ Sociol & Stat Div, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; FOOD DESERT; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; RISK-FACTORS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; DISPARITIES; OBESITY; WALKABILITY; PERCEPTIONS; SUPERMARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.023
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite the growing recognition of the importance of neighborhood conditions for cardiometabolic health, causal relationships have been difficult to establish owing to a reliance on cross-sectional designs and selection bias. This is the first natural experiment to examine the impact of neighborhood revitalization on cardiometabolic outcomes in residents from 2 predominantly African American neighborhoods, one of which has experienced significant revitalization (intervention), whereas the other has not (comparison). Methods: The sample included 532 adults (95% African American, 80% female, mean age=58.9 years) from 2 sociodemographically similar, low-income neighborhoods in Pittsburgh, PA, with preintervention and postintervention measures (2016 and 2018) of BMI, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and covariates. Data were collected in 2016 and 2018 and analyzed in 2020. Results: Difference-in-difference analyses showed significant improvement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in intervention residents relative to that in the comparison neighborhood (b=3.88, 95% CI=0.47, 7.29). There was also a significant difference-in-difference estimate in diastolic blood pressure (b=3.00, 95% CI=0.57, 5.43), with residents of the intervention neighborhood showing a greater increase in diastolic blood pressure than those in the comparison neighborhood. No statistically significant differences were found for other outcomes. Conclusions: Investing in disadvantaged neighborhoods has been suggested as a strategy to reduce health disparities. Using a natural experiment, findings suggest that improving neighborhood conditions may have a mixed impact on certain aspects of cardiometabolic health. Findings underscore the importance of examining the upstream causes of health disparities using rigorous designs and longer follow-up periods that provide more powerful tests of causality. (C) 2021 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 691
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条