Visual performance of competitive athletes in comparison to nonathletes and recreational athletes

被引:0
|
作者
Koppelwiser, Theresa [1 ]
Darius, Sabine [1 ]
Boeckelmann, Irina [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto von Guericke Univ, Bereich Arbeitsmed, Med Fak, Leipziger Str 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Visual performance; Peripheral perception; Depth visual acuity; PLAYERS; ACUITY;
D O I
10.1007/s40664-021-00449-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Visual abilities and adaptive reserves in the area of visual motor skills are possible factors influencing athletic performance. They are important for achieving sporting success and are therefore the focus of research. The aim of the work was to investigate whether competitive athletes show better visual performance than nonathletes and whether there are differences between individual and team athletes. In a cross-sectional study, peripheral perception, stereo vision and afferent dynamic vision were tested in 61 men and 61 women aged between 14 and 59 years. According to their sporting activity, they were divided into the control group (nonathletes/recreational athletes; n = 42) and competitive athletes (n = 80) with more than 4 training sessions per week over more than 3 years in the subgroups individual sport (n = 37) and team sport (n = 43). Group differences were tested with the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test. The results showed only isolated significant differences with respect to visual abilities. With an average of 74.3 +/- 55.2 angular seconds, the competitive athletes had better depth visual acuity than the control group with 97.2 +/- 79,8 angular seconds (p < 0.05). Peripheral perception tended to be better in competitive athletes compared to nonatletes/leisure athletes. Approximately 2.5% of competitive athletes were ametropic with visual acuity below 0.63. This study highlights the need to test the visual performance of athletes, e.g. in order to draw the consequences for targeted sport-specific training of these functions.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ALCOHOL-USE AND ATTITUDES - A COMPARISON OF COLLEGE ATHLETES AND NONATHLETES
    OVERMAN, SJ
    TERRY, T
    JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION, 1991, 21 (02) : 107 - 117
  • [22] A Comparison of Lifestyle Behaviors Between Student-Athletes and Nonathletes
    Stefanadis, Alyssa
    Lam, Eddie T. C.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2014, 85 : 123 - 124
  • [23] Comparison of equilibrium and physical capacities between old athletes and nonathletes
    Mohammad, MohammadAskari
    Zar, Abdossaleh
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2008, 16 : S161 - S161
  • [24] CROSS RACIAL COMPARISON OF PERSONALITY TRAITS BETWEEN ATHLETES AND NONATHLETES
    HUNT, DH
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1969, 40 (04): : 704 - 707
  • [25] ATHLETES AND NONATHLETES EXPECTATIONS ABOUT COUNSELING
    MILLER, MJ
    MOORE, KK
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 34 (04) : 267 - 270
  • [26] Alcohol, Tobacco, Illicit Drugs, and Performance Enhancers: A Comparison of Use by College Student Athletes and Nonathletes
    Yusko, David A.
    Buckman, Jennifer F.
    White, Helene R.
    Pandina, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2008, 56 (03) : 281 - 289
  • [27] Visuomotor Skills in Collegiate Athletes and Nonathletes
    Nastasi, Julie
    Cheng, Alyssa
    Cisto, Rachael
    Hollander, Cassidy
    Hooper, Brianne
    Ioannou, Niki
    Nickel, Jessica
    Pendergast, Taylor
    Toron, Marjorie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2018, 72 (04):
  • [28] Dietary intake of adolescent athletes and nonathletes
    Kern, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 106 (05) : 717 - 718
  • [29] IMMUNE FUNCTION IN ATHLETES VERSUS NONATHLETES
    NIEMAN, DC
    BRENDLE, D
    HENSON, DA
    SUTTLES, J
    COOK, VD
    WARREN, BJ
    BUTTERWORTH, DE
    FAGOAGA, OR
    NEHLSENCANNARELLA, SL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1995, 16 (05) : 329 - 333
  • [30] HEALTH MAINTENANCE - PARAPLEGIC ATHLETES AND NONATHLETES
    STOTTS, KM
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1986, 67 (02): : 109 - 114