Comparison of spatial interpolation methods in the first order stationary multiplicative spatial autoregressive models

被引:4
|
作者
Saber, M. M. [1 ]
Nematollahi, A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Dept Stat, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
MSAR model; Multivariate asymmetric Laplace; Pitman's measure of closeness; MCMC; REGRESSION-MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/03610926.2016.1205619
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Three linear prediction methods of a single missing value for a stationary first order multiplicative spatial autoregressive model are proposed based on the quarter observations, observations in the first neighborhood, and observations in the nearest neighborhood. Three different types of innovations including Gaussian (symmetric and thin tailed), exponential (skew to right), and asymmetric Laplace (skew and heavy tailed) are considered. In each case, the proposed predictors are compared based on the two well-known criteria: mean square prediction and Pitman's measure of closeness. Parameter estimation is performed by maximum likelihood, least square errors, and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).
引用
收藏
页码:9230 / 9246
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Indirect inference estimation of higher-order spatial autoregressive models
    Bao, Yong
    ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2023, 42 (03) : 247 - 280
  • [22] Comparison of common spatial interpolation methods for analyzing pollutant spatial distributions at contaminated sites
    Pengwei Qiao
    Peizhong Li
    Yanjun Cheng
    Wenxia Wei
    Sucai Yang
    Mei Lei
    Tongbin Chen
    Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2019, 41 : 2709 - 2730
  • [23] Mapping the Spatial Variability of Plant Diversity in a Tropical Forest: Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods
    J. Luis Hernandez-Stefanoni
    Raul Ponce-Hernandez
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2006, 117 : 307 - 334
  • [24] Comparison of common spatial interpolation methods for analyzing pollutant spatial distributions at contaminated sites
    Qiao, Pengwei
    Li, Peizhong
    Cheng, Yanjun
    Wei, Wenxia
    Yang, Sucai
    Lei, Mei
    Chen, Tongbin
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2019, 41 (06) : 2709 - 2730
  • [25] Mapping the spatial variability of plant diversity in a tropical forest: Comparison of spatial interpolation methods
    Hernandez-Stefanoni, J. Luis
    Ponce-Hernandez, Raul
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 117 (1-3) : 307 - 334
  • [26] Dynamic spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances
    Catania, Leopoldo
    Bille, Anna Gloria
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2017, 32 (06) : 1178 - 1196
  • [27] SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHODS - A REVIEW
    LAM, NSN
    AMERICAN CARTOGRAPHER, 1983, 10 (02): : 129 - 149
  • [28] Cox-type tests for competing spatial autoregressive models with spatial autoregressive disturbances
    Jin, Fei
    Lee, Lung-fei
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2013, 43 (04) : 590 - 616
  • [29] Small-sample Properties of Panel Spatial Autoregressive Models: Comparison of the Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Methods
    Kakamu, Kazuhiko
    Wago, Hajime
    SPATIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2008, 3 (03) : 305 - 319
  • [30] Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimating the precipitation distribution in Portugal
    Alexandru Antal
    Pedro M. P. Guerreiro
    Sorin Cheval
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2021, 145 : 1193 - 1206