Symptoms and lung function follow-up after lung cancer resection

被引:1
|
作者
Borg, Morten [1 ]
Lokke, Anders [2 ,3 ]
Rasmussen, Torben Riis [4 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Dis, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Lillebaelt Hosp Vejle, Dept Internal Med, Vejle, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Odense, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Dis & Allergy, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2021年 / 68卷 / 10期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION In recent decades, lung cancer is being diagnosed at ever earlier stages, leading to higher resection rates and improved survival. Therefore, more patients live with the sequelae of thoracic surgery. The standardised Danish follow-up programme after lung cancer resection includes CT and clinical evaluation at set times. METHODS An e-mail survey was conducted to evaluate local practices at lung cancer investigation sites with respect to the setup of follow-up programmes after lung cancer resection. In addition, 50 consecutive patients were seen three months after their lung cancer resection. Spirometry was performed and patients reported on their use of inhalation medicine, smoking status and quality of life. RESULTS The study revealed heterogeneous setups regarding routine spirometry (5/12 sites) and assessment by a respiratory physician (6/12). In a single-centre study including 50 patients three months after lung cancer resection, 22% of patients were using a bronchodilator even though 50% of patients were obstructive on spirometry and 48% reported shortness of breath (SOB). 17% of patients were active smokers, whereas the majority reported symptoms of a physical nature such as fatigue, SOB and cough. CONCLUSIONS It is important to establish the optimal follow-up setup with an emphasis on detection of recurrence, symptom improvement and smoking cessation. This study highlighted the importance of symptom assessment by a respiratory physician/nurse. A spirometry should be performed if patients experience SOB and the potential benefit of inhalation medicine should be assessed. FUNDING none. TRIAL REGISTRATION not relevant.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring the role of virtual lung cancer follow-up post-surgical resection
    Devlin, P.
    Reid, P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 139 : S88 - S88
  • [32] Atrial Resection for Lung Cancer: Morbidity, Mortality, and Long-Term Follow-up
    Andreas Kuehnl
    Michael Lindner
    Hans-Martin Hornung
    Hauke Winter
    Karl-Walter Jauch
    Rudolf A. Hatz
    Christian Graeb
    World Journal of Surgery, 2010, 34 : 2233 - 2239
  • [33] Exploring the role of virtual lung cancer follow-up post-surgical resection
    Devlin, Patrick
    Reid, Philip
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [34] Longitudinal follow-up of lung function in ataxia telangiectasia
    Vilozni, Daphna
    Lavie, Moran
    Sarouk, Ifat
    Levi, Yonit
    Efrati, Ori
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 40
  • [35] Follow up after resection of lung cancer: a survey of surgical practice in the UK and Ireland
    Greenwood, A. J.
    West, D. G.
    LUNG CANCER, 2013, 79 : S38 - S38
  • [36] FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION RESULTS AND CHANGES IN PULMONARY-FUNCTION FOLLOWING LUNG RESECTION IN CHILDHOOD
    HOLSCHNEIDER, AM
    SCHLACHTENRATH, R
    KNOOP, U
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KINDERCHIRURGIE-SURGERY IN INFANCY AND CHILDHOOD, 1990, 45 (06): : 349 - 359
  • [37] Follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer
    Lewis, JD
    Kochman, ML
    Hoops, TC
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 115 (01) : 249 - 249
  • [38] Follow-up After Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer
    Fahy, Bridget N.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 738 - 746
  • [39] Rational Follow-Up After Curative Cancer Resection
    Furman, Matthew J.
    Lambert, Laura A.
    Sullivan, Mary E.
    Whalen, Giles F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (09) : 1130 - 1133
  • [40] Intensity of Follow-up after Pancreatic Cancer Resection
    Castellanos, Jason A.
    Merchant, Nipun B.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 747 - 751